Method for selecting disease resistant mutant plants

ABSTRACT

Methods are provided for selecting parental plants exhibiting disease resistance and for using these plants in breeding programs. In one method of the invention, constitutive immunity (cim) mutants are screened for either resistance to a pathogen of interest or for the expression of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) genes. Such mutants having the desired traits or expressing the desired genes are then used in breeding programs. Parent plants can also be selected based on the constitutive expression of SAR genes. These mutants are phenotypically normal yet exhibit a significant level of disease resistance. Also disclosed are lesion-simulating-disease (lsd) mutants having a lesion mimic phenotype that also express SAR genes and exhibit disease resistance. Further disclosed are non-inducible immunity (nim) mutants that do not express SAR genes, even when induced by a pathogen. Methods of use for these mutants are also disclosed.

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/992,801,filed Dec. 18, 1997, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser.No. 08/648,949, filed May 16, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,904, whichis a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/165,238, filed Dec.10, 1993, abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser.No. 08/002,285, filed Jan. 8, 1993, abandoned. The complete disclosuresof each of these parent applications are incorporated herein byreference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to disease resistance in plants,particularly identifying and breeding disease resistance into plantsbased on constitutive expression of genes associated with systemicacquired resistance (SAR).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Plants are constantly challenged by a wide variety of pathogenicorganisms including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes. Crop plantsare particularly vulnerable because they are usually grown asgenetically uniform monocultures; when disease strikes, losses can besevere. However, most plants have their own innate mechanisms of defenseagainst pathogenic organisms. Natural disease resistance genes oftenprovide high levels of resistance to or immunity against pathogens.

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is one component of the complexsystem plants use to defend themselves from pathogens (Hunt and Ryals,Crit. Rev. in Plant Sci. 15, 583-606 (1996); Ryals et al., Plant Cell 8,1809-1819 (1996); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,395; each of which isincorporated herein by reference). SAR is a particularly importantaspect of plant-pathogen responses because it is a pathogen-inducible,systemic resistance against a broad spectrum of infectious agents,including viruses, bacteria, and fungi. When the SAR signal transductionpathway is blocked, plants become more susceptible to pathogens thatnormally cause disease, and they also become susceptible to someinfectious agents that would not normally cause disease (Gaffney et al.,Science 261, 754-756 (1993); Delaney et al., Science 266, 1247-1250(1994); Delaney et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6602-6606 (1995);Delaney, Plant Phys. 113, 5-12 (1997); Bi et al., Plant J. 8, 235-245(1995); and Mauch-Mani and Slusarenko, Plant Cell 8, 203-212 (1996);each of which is incorporated herein by reference). These observationsindicate that the SAR signal transduction pathway is critical formaintaining plant health.

Conceptually, the SAR response can be divided into two phases. In theinitiation phase, a pathogen infection is recognized and a signal isreleased that travels through the phloem to distant tissues. Thissystemic signal is perceived by target cells, which react by expressionof both SAR genes and disease resistance. The maintenance phase of SARrefers to the period of time, from weeks up to the entire life of theplant, during which the plant is in a quasi steady state and diseaseresistance is maintained (Ryals et al., 1996).

Associated with the onset of SAR is the expression of a set of genescalled SAR genes, many of which belong to the family ofpathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. A protein is classified as an SARprotein when its presence or activity correlates tightly withmaintenance of SAR (Neuenschwander et al., Plant-Microbe Interactions,Vol. 1, G. Stacey & N. T. Keen, eds. (New York, N.Y.: Chapman and Hall),pp. 81-106 (1996), incorporated herein by reference). These proteinsrepresent markers for SAR in a sense that SAR is not found in theabsence of SAR proteins. PR proteins are induced in large amounts inresponse to infection by various pathogens, including viruses, bacteriaand fungi. Some of these proteins have a role in providing systemicacquired resistance to the plant. Pathogenesis-related proteins werefirst discovered in tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum) reactinghypersensitively to infection with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV).Subsequently, PR proteins have been found in many plant species (See,for example, Redolfi et al. (1983) Neth J Plant Pathol 89:245-254; VanLoon (1985) Plant Mol. Biol. 4:111-116; and Uknes et al. (1992) PlantCell 4:645-656; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.) Suchproteins are believed to be a common defensive systemic response ofplants to infection by pathogens. Pathogenesis-related proteins include,but are not limited to, SAR8.2 proteins, acidic and basic forms oftobacco PR-1a, PR-1b, and PR-1c, PR-1', PR-2, PR-2', PR-2", PR-N, PR-O,PR-O', PR4, PR-P, PR-Q, PR-S, and PR-R proteins, cucumber peroxidases,the chitinase which is a basic counterpart of PR-P or PR-Q, and thebeta-1,3-glucanase (glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, EC 3.2.1.39) whichis a basic counterpart of PR-2, PR-N or PR-O, and the pathogen-induciblechitinase from cucumber. See, for example, Ward et al. (1991) Plant Cell3, 1085-1094, incorporated herein by reference. See also, Uknes et al.(1992); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,395. Transgenic disease-resistant plantshave been created by transforming plants with various SAR genes,including PR protein genes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,395).

Salicylic acid (SA) accumulation appears to be required for SAR signaltransduction. Plants that cannot accumulate SA due to treatment withspecific inhibitors, epigenetic repression of phenylalanineammonia-lyase, or transgenic expression of salicylate hydroxylase, whichspecifically degrades SA, also cannot exhibit either SAR gene expressionor disease resistance (Gaffney et al., 1993; Delaney et al., 1994;Mauch-Mani and Slusarenko 1996; Maher et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91, 7802-7806 (1994), incorporated herein by reference; Pallas et al.,Plant J. 10, 281-293 (1996), incorporated herein by reference). Althoughit has been suggested that SA might serve as the systemic signal, thisis currently controversial and, to date, all that is known for certainis that if SA cannot accumulate, then SAR signal transduction is blocked(Pallas et al., 1996; Shulaev et al., Plant Cell 7, 1691-1701 (1995),incorporated herein by reference; Vernooij et al., Plant Cell 6, 959-965(1994), incorporated herein by reference).

Recently, Arabidopsis has emerged as a model system to study SAR (Ukneset al. (1992); Uknes et al., Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6, 692-698(1993); Cameron et al., Plant J. 5, 715-725 (1994); Mauch-Mani andSlusarenko, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7, 378-383 (1994); Dempsey andKlessig, Bulletin de L'Institut Pasteur 93, 167-186 (1995); all of whichare incorporated herein by reference). It has been demonstrated that SARcan be activated in Arabidopsis by both pathogens and chemicals, such asSA, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) andbenzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH) (Ukneset al., 1992; Vernooij et al., Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8, 228-234(1995), incorporated herein by reference; Lawton et al., Plant J. 10,71-82 (1996), incorporated herein by reference). Following treatmentwith either INA or BTH or pathogen infection, at least three PR proteingenes, namely, PR-1, PR-2, and PR-5 are coordinately induced concomitantwith the onset of resistance (Uknes et al., 1992, 1993).

While there have therefore been advances in plant genetic engineering,the prospects for the general use of these techniques for plantimprovement are tempered by the realization that relatively few genescorresponding to plant traits of interest have been identified orcloned. Further, traits of interest often involve multi-gene families.Selection for plants carrying pathogen or disease resistance genes isthus laborious and time consuming. There is therefore needed a method toidentify plants expressing resistance genes for use in plant breedingprograms.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is drawn to methods for breeding diseaseresistance or resistance to pathogens into plants. Lesion or diseasemimic mutants can be utilized to identify plants having desired traitssuch as a disease resistant phenotype. This method involves selectingdisease lesion mimic mutants based on either resistance to a pathogen ofinterest or on the expression of systemic acquired resistance (SAR)genes. Such mutants having the desired traits or expressing the desiredgenes are then used in breeding programs.

Additionally, plants for use in a breeding program can be selected basedon constitutive expression of SAR genes. That is, visible phenotypicallynormal plants that constitutively express SAR genes can be utilized.Progeny are screened for either resistance to a pathogen of interest orfor the expression of systemic acquired resistance genes. Because thesemutants have a significant level of disease resistance and no apparentnegative phenotype, they have utility in breeding crop plants withconstitutive, hereditary disease resistance. As an alternative toassaying on the basis of SAR gene expression, it is also possible to usea line transformed with a reporter gene such as luciferase under theregulation of an SAR gene promoter such as the PR-1 a promoter as astock line in which to generate new mutants; constitutive expressors ofthe reporter gene also therefore constitutively express SAR genes.

The invention is further drawn to the selection and utilization of plantmutants that do not express systemic acquired resistance genes, evenwhen induced by a pathogen. Such non-inducible immunity mutants, whichhave a universal disease susceptible phenotype, have utility in diseaseand pathogenesis testing and fungicide screening programs.

DEFINITIONS

For clarity, certain terms used in the specification are defined andpresented as follows:

cim: constitutive immunity phenotype. Also refers to disease resistantmutant plants having this phenotype in the absence of lesions (a.k.a.cim Class II).

cim Class I: class of mutants characterized by having lesions, highconstitutive salicylic acid levels, and high constitutive levels of SARgene expression. Also referred to as lsd mutants.

cim Class II: class of mutants characterized by having high constitutivesalicylic acid levels and high constitutive levels of SAR geneexpression, but no lesions. Also referred to as cim mutants.

cim Class III: class of mutants characterized by having highconstitutive levels of SAR gene expression, but without lesions andwithout high constitutive salicylic acid levels.

lsd: lesion simulating disease phenotype. Also refers to diseaseresistant mutant plants having this lesion mimic phenotype (a.k.a. cimClass I).

nim: non-inducible immunity phenotype. Also refers to mutant plantshaving a universal disease susceptible phenotype, in which SAR can notbe activated by conventional biological and chemical activators of SAR.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Disease Resistant Mutants

The present invention relates to nontransgenic mutant plants that havean enhanced response to pathogen infection and therefore have a diseaseresistant phenotype. In one embodiment, the lesion mimic phenotype isused as a tool to identify plants having desired traits or expressinggenes of interest. In another embodiment, constitutive expression of SARgenes in the absence of a lesion mimic phenotype is used to selectdisease resistant mutants. In yet another embodiment, constitutiveexpression of SAR genes in the absence of a lesion mimic phenotype andthe absence of increased salicylic acid levels (an endogenous signal forSAR) may be used to select disease resistant mutants.

Thus, mutant plants that display enhanced disease resistance fall intothree broad classes. The first class consists of mutant plants thatdisplay spontaneous lesion formation in the absence of pathogen attackand mount an SAR response concomitant with cell death. Presumably,spontaneous necrosis triggers activation of SAR in these mutants. Thisclass of mutants has been designated as lsd mutants (lsd=LesionSimulating Disease), which are also referred to herein as "cim Class I"mutants. lsd (aka cim Class I) mutants form spontaneous lesions on theleaves, have high constitutive salicylic acid levels (an endogenoussignal for SAR), have high levels of PR-1, PR-2 and PR-5 mRNA, and areresistant to fungal and bacterial pathogens. (See, for example, Dietrichet al. (1994) and Weymann et al. (1995)).

Lesions are a hypersensitive reaction characterized by a local necrosisof the tissues immediately surrounding the infection site of thepathogen and a subsequent localization of the pathogen, which is incontrast to a sensitive reaction wherein the pathogen spreads throughoutthe plant. Lesion mimic mutants exhibit the hypersensitive reactionwithout having had any contact with a pathogen. Lesion mimic mutants arewidely known in plants. Such lesion mimic mutants may be obtained frommutagenesis or by spontaneous mutation. In fact, both spontaneous andmutagen-induced cases of dominant and recessive mutants causing discreteleaf lesion formation have been reported in a number of plants includingmaize, tomato, wheat, tobacco, barley, sunflower, cucumber, etc. See,for example, Neuffer and Calvert (1975) The Journal of Heredity66:265-270; Cameron J. W. (1964) Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter38:32-33; Gardner C. O. (1971) Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 45:150;Hornbrook and Gardner (1970) Rad. Botany 10:113-117; Simmonds N. W.(1950) Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 24:26-27; and Walbot et al. (1983)in Genetic Engineering of Plants, Kosuge et al. (eds.) Plenum PublishingCorporation. However, the present invention is the first to recognizethat the lesion mimic phenotype is associated with SAR and theexpression of pathogenesis-related proteins and that the expression ofSAR genes can be separated from the lesion phenotype.

The second class of disease resistant mutants consists of plants thatdisplay constitutive SAR gene expression and pathogen resistance in theabsence of spontaneous lesion formation. This class of mutants has beendesignated as cim mutants (cim=Constitutive IMmunity), which are alsoreferred to herein as "cim Class II" mutants. cim mutants have all thecharacteristics of lsd mutants except spontaneous lesions. As anexample, the cim3 mutant line described below in the experimentalsection falls into this cim class (aka cim Class II) and is a dominantmutation with wild-type appearance that expresses stable, elevatedlevels of SA, SAR gene mRNA, and has broad spectrum disease resistance.cim mutants may be obtained from mutagenesis or by spontaneous mutation.

The third class consists of mutants that display constitutive SAR geneexpression and pathogen resistance in the absence of spontaneous lesionformation and in the absence of increased levels of salicylic acidaccumulation.

The table below illustrates the characteristics of the three classes ofdisease resistant mutant plants.

    ______________________________________                                        ATTRIBUTE    cim Class I                                                                              cim Class II                                                                            cim Class III                               ______________________________________                                        Lesion.sup.1 +          -         -                                             SA.sup.2 + + -                                                                SAR Gene Expression.sup.3 + + +                                             ______________________________________                                         .sup.1 The presence +, or absence -, of the Lesion Mimic phenotype            .sup.2 Salicylic Acid detected                                                .sup.3 As measured by RNA gel blot analysis                              

Because SAR or SAR-like genes are expressed in all plant speciesexhibiting systemic acquired resistance, expression of such genes can bedetermined by probing with known SAR DNA sequences. See, for example,Lawton et al. (1993) "The molecular biology of systemic acquiredresistance" in Mechanisms of Defence Responses in Plants, B. Fritig andM. Legrand, eds. (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer AcademicPublishers), pp. 422-432, incorporated by reference herein in itsentirety; Uknes et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4:645-656; and Ward et al.(1991) Plant Cell 3:1085-1094. Methods for hybridization and cloning arewell known in the art. See, for example, Molecular Cloning, A LaboratoryManual, 2nd Edition, Vol. 1-3, Sambrook et al. (eds.) Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press (1989) and the references cited therein. Alternatively,such SAR or SAR-like genes can be found by other methods such as proteinscreening, ±screening, etc. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No.5,614,395;Liang and Pardee (1992) Science 257:967-971; and St. John and Davis(1979) Cell 16:443; herein incorporated by reference.

The present invention recognizes that SAR genes are constitutivelyexpressed in some lesion mimic mutant plants (lsd mutants). Furthermore,the lesion mimic phenotype can be separated from expression of the SARgenes. Therefore, lesion mimic mutants expressing SAR genes can beutilized in breeding programs. Progeny can be selected based onexpression of the SAR genes or resistance to pathogens and a desiredphenotype. This method offers a source of resistance to pathogens foruse in breeding programs. The present invention further recognizes thatSAR genes may be constitutively expressed in plants that do not exhibitany lesion formation or necrosis (cim mutants); that is, plants thatdisplay a normal phenotype. Such plants can also be used in breedingprograms.

As set forth below in the examples, a high-throughput Northern blotscreen was developed to identify mutant plants having highconcentrations of PR-1 mRNA during normal growth, with the idea thatthese mutants also exhibit systemic acquired resistance. A number ofmutants have been isolated using this screen and they have been shown toaccumulate not only PR-1 but also PR-2 and PR-5 mRNAs (Lawton et al.(1993); Dietrich et al. (1994); and Weymann et al. (1995)). Thesemutants also have elevated levels of SA and are resistant to pathogeninfection, confirming that this approach can be used to isolate SARsignal transduction mutants. Both cim Class I (lsd) and cim Class II(cim) mutants have been isolated using this screen.

As an alternative to assaying on the basis of SAR gene expression, it ispossible to use a line transformed with a reporter gene such asluciferase under the regulation of an SAR gene promoter such as thePR-1a promoter as stock line in which to generate new mutants; mutantsthat constitutively express SAR genes therefore also constitutivelyexpress the reporter gene. As described below in the examples,transgenic plant lines harboring a chimeric PR-1 promoter/luciferase(PR-1/luc) construct were developed. Following treatment of these lineswith either chemical activators of SAR or incompatible pathogens,luciferase activity was induced several thousand fold concomitant withinduction of PR-1 expression. In PR-1/luc plants, biological inductionof SAR gene expression can be followed by detection of light emission.This was shown by treatment of one PR-1/luc line with turnip crinklevirus (TCV) leading to a hypersensitive response. Nine days after TCVinoculation, in vivo monitoring of photon emission revealed that alluntreated leaves displayed elevated levels of luciferase activity.

To isolate mutants that displayed constitutive SAR in the absence ofspontaneous cell death, seeds of PR-1/luc plants were mutagenized. M₂progeny were screened for constitutive luciferase activity in vivo, and605 potential mutants were isolated. 249 of these mutations were lethal,and 266 mutants displayed visible lesion formation. Upon analysis of the90 remaining mutants in the next generation, trypan blue stainingrevealed that 74 of them were lsd class mutants and 16 of them were cimclass mutants. Both classes of mutants exhibited elevated levels ofsalicylic acid, constitutive SAR gene expression, and increasedresistance to pathogens such as Peronospora parasitica.

The PR-1/luciferase reporter system was chosen because luciferaseactivity can be monitored in vivo without affecting the integrity of theplant. This feature opens up the possibility to perform rapidexamination of many plants as well as to reexamine the same tissueseveral times throughout an experiment (Millar et al., (1992) Plant Mol.Biol. Rep. 10, 324-337). Interestingly, the in planta pool of luciferaseprotein can be inactivated by treatment with luciferin. This facilitatesthe study of luciferase transcription over a defined time period,regardless of the luciferase pool present before treatment withluciferin (Millar et al., 1992). Also, luciferase activity can easily bereexamined in vitro providing the means for fast confirmation of resultsobtained by in vivo monitoring.

Three lines of evidence correlate light emission by PR-1/luc plants withSAR-gene expression:

(i) Treatment with chemical activators of SAR gene expression inducesluciferase activity in vivo and in vitro as well as PR-1 mRNA levelswith similar kinetics.

(ii) Infection of PR-1/luc plants with a biological inducer activatesluciferase activity and PR-1 gene expression in both local and systemictissue.

(iii) Mutants identified by in vivo monitoring of constitutiveluciferase activity display both constitutive SAR gene expression (PR-1,PR-2 and PR-5) and enhanced resistance to P. parasitica.

Taken together, these results indicate that in PR-1/luc plants, in vivomonitoring of luciferase activity provides a method for detection of theonset of SAR in these plants.

Once plants that constitutively express SAR genes are selected, forexample, by one of the above-described screening methods, they can beutilized in breeding programs to incorporate constitutive expression ofthe SAR genes and resistance to pathogens of interest into plant lines.Progeny for further crossing are selected based on expression of the SARgenes and disease resistance as well as for other characteristicsimportant for production and quality.

Pathogens of interest include but are not limited to viruses or viroids,e.g. tobacco or cucumber mosaic virus, ringspot virus or necrosis virus,pelargonium leaf curl virus, red clover mottle virus, tomato bushy stuntvirus, and like viruses; fungi, e.g. Phytophthora parasitica,Peronospora tabacina, etc.; bacteria, e.g. Pseudomonas syringae,Pseudomonas tabaci, etc.; insects, such as aphids e.g. Myzus persicae;nematodes, e.g. Meloidogyne incognita; lepidoptera, e.g. Heliothus spp.etc. The methods of the invention are useful against a number of diseaseorganisms of maize including but not limited to downy mildews such asScleropthora macrospora, Sclerophthora rayissiae, Sclerosporagraminicola, Peronosclerospora sorghi, Peronosclerospora philippinensis,Peronosclerospora sacchari, Peronosclerospora maydis; rusts such asPuccinia sorphi, Puccinia polysora, Physopella zeae; other fungi such asCercospora zeae-maydis, Colletotrichum graminicola, Fusariummonoliforme, Exserohilum turcicum, Bipolaris maydis; and bacteria suchas Erwinia stewartii.

The present invention avoids the screening of a large amount ofmaterial, including world collections and related species, generallynecessary to identify usable resistance genes. Instead the methodsdescribed herein may be used to identify plants that potentially expressresistance genes.

Accordingly, lsd or cim mutants of a plant of interest are selected andtested for resistance to a pathogen of interest or alternatively forconstitutive expression of SAR genes. Such mutants are then used inbreeding programs to introduce the resistance trait into breeding lines.That is, the constitutive expression of the SAR genes is introduced intoplants. Such constitutive expression of the SAR genes is associated withimmunity to pathogens.

Following the use of the selected lesion mutant or plant thatconstitutively expresses SAR genes in the breeding program, theresistance trait is incorporated into plant lines through breeding incombination with other characteristics important for production andquality. Breeding approaches and techniques are known in the art. See,for example, Welsh J. R., Fundamentals of Plant Genetics and Breeding,John Wiley & Sons, NY (1981); Crop Breeding, Wood D. R. (Ed.) AmericanSociety of Agronomy Madison, Wis. (1983); Mayo O., The Theory of PlantBreeding, Second Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987); Singh, D. P.,Breeding for Resistance to Diseases and Insect Pests, Springer-Verlag,NY (1986); and Wricke and Weber, Quantitative Genetics and Selection inPlant Breeding, Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin (1986).

Disease resistant mutants have been reported in a variety of plantsincluding but not limited to maize, tomato, wheat, Arabidopsis, oats,tobacco, sunflower, cucumber, etc. Accordingly, the invention can beused in breeding any plant in which disease resistant mutants can befound or induced through mutagenesis. Methods are known in the art formutagenesis and selection.

Universal Disease Susceptible Mutants

The present invention further relates to nontransgenic mutants that aredefective in their normal response to pathogen infection in that they donot express genes associated with systemic acquired resistance. Thesemutants are referred to as nim mutants (for non-inducible immunity) andare useful as "universal disease susceptible" (UDS) plants by virtue oftheir being susceptible to many strains and pathotypes of pathogens ofthe host plant and also to pathogens that do not normally infect thehost plant, but that normally infect other hosts. They can be selectedby treating seeds or other biological material with mutagenic agents andthen selecting progeny plants for the UDS phenotype by treating progenyplants with known chemical inducers (e.g. INA) of the systemic acquiredresponse and then infecting the plants with a known pathogen.Non-inducible mutants develop severe disease symptoms under thesecircumstances, whereas non-mutants are induced by the chemical compoundto systemic acquired resistance. nim mutants can be equally selectedfrom mutant populations generated by chemical and irradiationmutagenesis, as well as from populations generated by T-DNA insertionand transposon-induced mutagenesis. Techniques of generating mutantplant lines are well known in the art.

As SAR and SAR gene expression is a phenomenon ubiquitous to plants ingeneral, nim mutants can be generated from any plant species. Diseasesusceptible plants incapable of expressing SAR genes have been createdby transforming various species with the nahG gene. As set forth above,the nahG gene encodes salicylate hydroxylase, which specificallydegrades SA. Without SA, NahG plants cannot express SAR genes andexhibit SAR in response to pathogen infection or chemical induction,both of which normally activate SAR (Gaffney et al., 1993). Thus, nahGeffectively blocks the SAR pathway. The nim mutation also blocks the SARpathway. Thus, like NahG plants, universal disease susceptible nimmutants that also are incapable of expressing SAR genes are not limitedto any particular plant species.

nim mutants provide useful indicators of the evaluation of diseasepressure in field pathogenesis tests where the natural resistancephenotype of so-called wild-type (i.e. non-mutant) plants may vary andtherefore not provide a reliable standard of susceptibility.Furthermore, nim plants have additional utility for the testing ofcandidate disease resistance transgenes. Using a nim stock line as arecipient for transgenes, the contribution of the transgene to diseaseresistance is directly assessable over a base level of susceptibility.Furthermore, the nim plants are useful as a tool in the understanding ofplant-pathogen interactions. nim host plants do not mount a systemicresponse to pathogen attack, and the unabated development of thepathogen is an ideal system in which to study its biological interactionwith the host.

As nim host plants may also be susceptible to pathogens outside of thehost-range they normally fall, these plants also have significantutility in the molecular, genetic, and biological study of host-pathogeninteractions. Furthermore, the UDS phenotype of nim plants also rendersthem of utility for fungicide screening. nim mutants selected in aparticular host have considerable utility for the screening offungicides using that host and pathogens of the host. The advantage liesin the UDS phenotype of the mutant, which circumvents the problemsencountered by hosts being differentially susceptible to differentpathogens and pathotypes, or even resistant to some pathogens orpathotypes.

nim mutants have further utility for the screening of fungicides againsta range of pathogens and pathotypes using a heterologous host i.e. ahost which may not normally be within the host species range of aparticular pathogen. Thus, the susceptibility of nim mutants ofArabidopsis (which is an easily manipulatable species and has limitedspace requirements) to pathogens of other species (e.g. crop plantspecies) would facilitate efficacious fungicide screening procedures forcompounds against important pathogens of crop plants.

Gene Mapping

After lesion mimic mutants, phenotypically normal mutant plantsconstitutively expressing SAR genes, or universal disease susceptiblemutants have been identified, further analysis can be performed to yieldinformation that is useful in breeding programs. For example,restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) associated with theexpression of the SAR genes and resistance can be identified. Once atleast one RFLP associated with disease resistance or susceptibility isdetermined, this RFLP can then be used to screen for the presence of theresistance or susceptible phenotype. RFLPs are valuable to plantbreeders to identify genes affecting agronomic traits on the plantgenome through the identification of linked genetic markers. Geneticlinkage analysis between DNA polymorphisms and traits of agronomicimportance is useful to identify agronomically important genes, toclassify inbreds, hybrids and breeding populations according to theirgenes, and then more effectively incorporate these genes into improvedinbreds and hybrids.

RFLPs associated with disease resistance are potentially of great valueto breeders. Therefore, the invention encompasses analyzing chromosomesto identify DNA polymorphisms linked with the lesion mimic phenotype andwith expression of SAR genes. To practice one aspect of the invention,the lesion mutant phenotype may be used as the phenotype associated withdisease resistance. RFLPs can then be found that are associated with thelesion phenotype and disease resistance. Similarly, RFLPs can be foundthat are associated with the cim and nim phenotypes. The RFLP can thenbe used in a breeding program of choice. The identified genetic linkagesbetween specific probes and genetic components of agronomicallyimportant traits are used as an aid in selecting plants and populationsin "classical" plant breeding based on Mendelian genetics.

Methods for determining RFLPs and the identification of polymorphismsassociated with particular traits are known in the art. See, forexample, Burr et al. (1983), "The application of restriction fragmentlength polymorphism to plant breeding", in Genetic engineeringprinciples and methods, Vol. 5 (eds. J. D. Selow & A. Hollaender) pp.45-59, New York, Plenum Press; Helentjaris T. (1987) Trends in Genetics3:217-221; Helentjaris et al. (1985) Plant Mol. Biol. 5:109-118; WO89/07647; EP 0317239; and EP 0306139.

In a typical method to identify a polymorphism according to theinvention, DNA is extracted from the plant cell and digested with agiven restriction endonuclease. After the digest is obtained, and thedigested DNA is separated by standard techniques such as agarose gelelectrophoresis, the separated bands are probed with a DNA fragmentcoding for the RFLP sequence.

Probes must be found to detect a polymorphism if it is to be useful fortesting linkage to the desired trait. The polymorphism must be found tobe linked to genes affecting traits or to other useful markers instudies, or to be immediately adjacent to pre-existing markers. Theparticular probe can be of any desired sequence length as long as it iscapable of identifying the polymorphism in the involved DNA region orlocus.

Methods for generating additional new DNA fragments also linked with thegene for a particular trait are as follows. A first method is to testrandomly chosen DNA fragments that map to the appropriate region of thegenomic map. Such mapping can be achieved by in situ hybridization tometaphase chromosome spreads or by genetic linkage to any marker alreadymapped to the region.

Additional DNA probes may be obtained by constructing a library from DNAisolated from metaphase chromosomes. Such chromosomes may be sorted, forexample on a fluorescence activated cell sorter.

Finally, new DNA probes may be obtained from the region of thechromosome containing the agronomically important gene by using anyprobes already mapped to the region to "fish out" adjacent overlappingpieces of DNA from genomic libraries (chromosome walking).

Other methods for the identification of markers linked todisease-resistance genes are known in the art and can be used in thepresent invention. Such methods include, but are not limited tosegregant analysis as a method for rapidly identifying markers(Michelmore et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9828-9832,herein incorporated by reference), and the use of RAPD (random amplifiedpolymorphic DNAs) as described by Williams et al. (1990) Nucleic AcidsRes. 18:6531-6535, herein incorporated by reference.

Methods for labeling the DNA probes and for hybridization are known inthe art. See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989).

Gene Cloning

The genes responsible for SAR gene expression and the lesion mimic traitin the lsd mutants, the genes responsible for SAR gene expression in thecim mutants, as well as the gene responsible for the nim mutantphenotype can be cloned and the corresponding cDNAs reintroduced intotransgenic plants in either sense or antisense orientation to modifyplant phenotype.

The cloning of the lsd, cim, and nim mutation genes can be undertakenusing techniques well known in the art. Markers that are located closeto the mutation of interest can be identified such as by using RFPL andRAPD technology. Typically this is done in a segregating population suchas the F2 generation derived from a cross between a homozygous mutantand homozygous non-isogenic race, but alternatively it can be done inanther cultured dihaploid lines derived from a heterozygote individual.Once markers have been identified that co-segregate with the desiredphenotype, the adjacent DNA can be cloned directly using the markers asprobes in a genomic library screen coupled with subsequent "genomewalking" to the desired destination. This step can be facilitated usingYAC cloning techniques, which enable the subcloning of larger genomicfragments than is possible using traditional lambda phage or cosmidcloning techniques. The target sequence is precisely identified from itsreintroduction from such a subclone into a host plant; depending onwhether the mutant phenotype is dominant or recessive, thereintroduction assay can be completed in the wild-type in primarytransformants, or subsequent segregating generations. Havingsuccessfully cloned the mutant gene, the wild-type gene is easilyclonable using the mutant gene as a probe in a library screen."Map-based cloning technology", as it is known in the art, is wellwithin the competence of one of ordinary skill in the art and isdescribed, for example, in Arondel et al. (Science 258: 1353-1358(1992)) and Martin et al. (Science 262: 1432-1436 (1993)). Recently, thegene responsible for the nim mutant phenotype was cloned (Ryals et al.(1997) Plant Cell 9, 425-439, incorporated herein by reference) and wasshown to share strong homology with the IκB class of mammaliantranscription regulators.

As the inventors have established the existence and utility of thelesion mimic and nim mutations described in this specification, it willbe apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the same types ofmutation can be remade using insertion mutagenic techniques, which thusfacilitate the subsequent cloning of the target gene of interest.Examples of insertion mutagenic techniques that are particularly usefulin the context of cloning genes from plants include the T-DNA insertiontechnique in which the T-DNA from Agrobacterium is inserted randomlyinto the genome, and transposon insertion mutagenesis, where a naturalor introduced transposon is induced to move to new locations throughoutthe genome. In each case the newly inserted DNA may disrupt a genefunction and this may be assayable phenotypically. In the context ofthis invention, the phenotype assayed would be lesion mimic phenotype,SAR gene expression, or UDS phenotype. The generation of T-DNA andtransposon insertion mutant collections is a well documented techniquein the literature and is well within the ordinary skill of the routineer(e.g. Feldman et al. (1989) Science 243: 1351-1354; Marks and Feldman(1989) Plant Cell 1: 1053-1050; Honma et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90: 6242-6246; and Aarts et al. (1993) Nature 363: 715-717.

For genes that are tagged by T-DNA insertions, the wild-typeuninterrupted gene can be cloned by firstly cloning the T-DNA taggedgene, and then using sequences in the host genome that flank the T-DNAsequence as probes in the cloning of the wild-type gene. Thesetechniques have been described by Feldman et al. (Science 243: 1351-1354(1989)), Marks and Feldman (Plant Cell 1: 1053-1050 (1989);) and Hayashiet al. (Science 258: 1350-1352). For genes that are tagged bytransposons, the wild-type uninterrupted gene can be cloned usingsimilar techniques and these have been described by Honma et al. (Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 6242-6246 (1993)) and Aarts et al. (Nature 363:715-717 (1993)).

An alternate approach to the cloning of genes tagged by insertionmutations is the use of subtraction techniques in which genomic DNA orcDNA derived from lines that are isogenic for all but the mutation arerepeatedly hybridized to remove homologous sequences. This causes anenrichment for the sequences that differ between the two populations andthat are subsequently subcloned and characterized. This technique andnumerous variations thereof have been described extensively in theliterature viz. Lamar and Palmer (1984) Cell 37: 171-177; Kunkel et al.(1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4778-4782; Nussbaum et al. (1987)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 6521-6525; Lisitsyn et al. (1993) Science259: 946-951.

Having cloned the wild-type gene from which the mutant phenotypederives, the cDNA corresponding to this wild type gene can be easilyisolated using hybridization techniques that are well known in the art.Once isolated, the cDNA can be expressed in transgenic plant lines insense orientation (to achieve overexpression of the gene) or inantisense orientation (to turn off the endogenous gene).

Expression in transgenic plants is achieved by the fusion of the cDNAidentified and cloned as described above behind a suitable promoter insense or antisense orientation. The cDNA is cloned into a plantexpression cassette behind a promoter expressed at high levels intransgenic plants and upstream of a transcriptional terminator that isknown to function in plants. A preferred promoter is the CaMV 35Spromoter and a preferred terminator is the nopaline synthase terminator.The expression cassette is transferred to a binary vector(pCGN1540--Alexander et al., PNAS 90: 7327-7331 (1993) for Agrobacteriumtransformation and a direct gene transfer vector (pCIB3064--Koziel etal., Biotechnology 11: 194-200) for direct gene transfer. Agrobacteriumis particularly suitable for the transformation of dicotyledonousspecies and direct gene transfer is particularly suitable for thetransformation of monocotyledonous species. Recently, tranformation ofmonocotyledons using Agrobacterium has also been described (WO 94/00977and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616). These techniques are well known in the artand are described in the two above-cited publications. Transgenic plantsare screened for expression of sense or antisense RNA by Northernanalysis and plants that express at high levels are selected for furtherphenotypic analysis.

Alternatively, promoters can be selected that have tissue specificexpression pattern and would thus localize the effects of sense orantisense expression to particular cell types (for examples of suchpromoters see Edwards and Coruzzi, Ann. Rev. Genet. 24: 275-303 (1990)).Additionally promoters can be selected that are chemically regulatableand can thus be induced to express the transgene upon treatment of thetransgenic plant with a specific chemical. A suitable promoter for thisis the PR-1a promoter from tobacco (U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,395).

The expression of the lsd, cim, and nim genes in transgenic plants inthe appropriate host genotype background can be used to manipulate bothdisease resistance and/or host cell death. A transgene in sense orantisense, which may cause the host cell death phenotype (akin to thecell death apparent in the lesions of the lesion mimic mutants), can beexpressed under the control of plant regulatory elements that are wellknown in the art to be expressed only in certain cell types (e.g. pollenor tapetal cells for the production of male sterility), or alternativelyunder the regulation of a chemically induced promoter (e.g. the PR-1apromoter). In one embodiment of the invention the transgene causing celldeath (e.g. the cim1-derived gene in antisense) is expressed under apollen specific promoter to cause male sterility in the female parent,whereas the pollinator carries a construct in antisense to the pollenspecific construct (i.e. antisense-to-antisense), which is fused to thechemically regulatable PR-1a promoter. Thus, in the F1 hybrid plantpopulation, treatment with the chemical inducer of the PR-1a promoterwill activate the pollinator-line derived gene and block the expressionof the mother parent-derived gene allowing normal flowering of the F1hybrid. In an analogous fashion, lines can be created that are femalesterile (by utilizing a promoter that is expressed in gynaecium tissueonly). From the biology of lsd, cim, and nim mutants described in thisspecification, it is apparent that disease resistance phenotypes can bemodified from the expression of antisense to lsd, cim, and nim genes. Inthe case of cim genes, elevated disease resistance would be expected,whereas for nim genes a reduction in disease resistance would beexpected.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specificationare indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art towhich this invention pertains. All publications and patent applicationsare herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if eachindividual publication or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by wayof limitation.

EXPERIMENTAL I. Lesion Mimic Mutants

The class of mutants described in this section of examples correspondsto the "cim Class I" mutants described supra, are also referred toherein as lsd mutants.

Example 1 Arabidopsis Lesion Mimic Mutants

Lesion mimic mutants were isolated during a screen for Arabidopsismutants with altered expression of a set of genes associated withsystemic acquired resistance (SAR genes), such as PR-1, PR-2, and PR-5(Ward et al. (1991)). EMS mutagenesis was conducted as follows:Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia seed was placed in a solution ofEMS for 12-24 hours, the seed was then washed and planted. When theplants were mature, groups of 1000 plants were harvested and the seedwas kept in a separately numbered lot. EMS-treated seed can also bepurchased from Lehle seed, Tucson, Ariz. M2 EMS-treated seed was plantedand plants were grown in individually marked containers. When the plantswere three weeks old, one to two leaves were harvested from each plant.RNA was isolated from the leaf samples and analyzed using RNA gel blotsprobed with PR-1 and PR-2 cDNAs. Seed was isolated from plants thatshowed high level expression of these two RNAs. In addition, anyinteresting morphological phenotypes were noted.

One plant showed lesion-like symptoms on the leaf margins that expandedinward to the midrib of the oldest leaves. These lesions were firstobservable when the plant was approximately three weeks old when grownunder 9 hour days. The gene conferring the trait that was mutated togive the phenotype was designated cim1 (aka lsd2). When progeny fromthis original plant were grown, approximately half had the lesion-mimicphenotype and high level SAR gene expression. The remainder of theplants looked phenotypically normal and had low-background levels of SARgene expression. These results are consistent with the mutant cim1 genehaving a dominant effect causing both the lesion mimic phenotype andaltered gene expression and the original cim1 plant being heterozygous.

Example 2 Disease Resistance of the cim1 Mutant

The cim1 mutant was tested for susceptibility/resistance to infection byPseudomonas and Peronospora. For the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas, inplanta bacterial growth was monitored over a five day period afterinoculation by injection of 10⁵ colony forming units per ml using theprocedure described by Debener et al. (1991) Plant J. 1: 289-302.Typically the cim1 mutant line resulted in a reduction in growth by anorder of magnitude compared to wild-type. This indicated that the cim1line had enhanced resistance to infection by Pseudomonas. To assesssusceptibility/resistance of cim1 to the fungal pathogen Peronosporaparasitica, 4 week old plants were either leaf inoculated using 2 ml ofa suspension of fresh conidiospores in water (@ 10⁵ spores/ml) orsprayed over the entire aerial plant surface (@ 10⁶ spores/ml). Thespore suspension was prepared as described by Dangl et al. (1993) Int.Rev. Cytol. 144: 53-83.

On comparison to wild-type, cim1 plants showed much less hyphal growthand conidiospore production. The leaf surfaces were visibly clearer ofPeronospora mycelium than wild-type plants and the plants thus showedelevated resistance to the fungus. The table below shows a summary ofdata. The altered fungal morphology and resistance phenotype was similarto that shown in Arabidopsis plants pre-treated with the SAR-inducingchemical INA (Uknes et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4: 645-656).

    ______________________________________                                        Peronospora parasitica Disease Ratings:                                              Number of Plants Expressing Disease Levels.sup.a                       Plant Line                                                                           0      +     ++  +++   ++++ +++++ total # of plants                    ______________________________________                                        Wild type                                                                            0      0     0   0     0    20    20                                     cim 1 0 6 7 0 0  0 13                                                       ______________________________________                                         .sup.a This scale is defined as:                                              0: No conidiophores on plant;                                                 +: At least 1 leaf with 1-5 conidiophores;                                    ++: At least one leaf with 5-20 conidiophores;                                +++: Many leaves with 5-20 conidiophores;                                     ++++: All inoculated leaves with >5 conidiophores;                            +++++: All inoculated leaves with >20 conidiophores.                     

Example 3 Tobacco Lesion Mimic Mutants

Transgenic tobacco line 1791C-18-2, which was transformed with the SARgene PR-Q, showed a lesion mimic phenotype. Fully expanded leaves hadmany 11-20 millimeter necrotic lesions. These lesions were typicallylight-brown at the center and surrounded by darkened tissue. When theplants were approximately 5 weeks old, they were infected withPhytophthora parasitica by soil application and resistance toPhytophthora parasitica was observed. However, other plants linestransgenic for PR-Q but not having the lesion mimic phenotype were notresistant to Phytophthora parasitica. This indicated that the observedresistance is caused by the altered phenotype of the plant (lesionmimic) and not the presence of the transgene.

Example 4 Construction and Characterization of the Transgenic Line1791C-18-2, Constitutively Expressing PR-Q

For general methods of preparing PR-Q, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,650,505,incorporated herein by reference.

A. Preparation of Purified PR-Q

Plants of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi.nc were grown in a greenhouse andinfected when 8 weeks old by rubbing the leaves with a suspension of thecommon strain (U1) of tobacco mosaic virus at a concentration of 0.5micrograms/ml, in a solution of 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0)containing carborundum. Leaves were harvested 7 days later. Theintercellular-fluid fraction was made from the leaves by the vacuuminfiltration method of Parent and Asselin, (1984) Can. J. Bot.62:564-569. The proteins PR-P and PR-Q were separated from the otherproteins present in the fraction by sequential purification through anUltragel AcA54 column, a DEAE-Sephacel column, and a reverse-phase HPLCphenyl column, and their recovery was monitored by comparing samples ofcrude intercellular-fluid with the purified fraction on 10%nondenaturing gels as described by Gianninazzi and Kassanis (1974) J.Gen. Vir. 23:1-9. Pure PR-Q was obtained from the mixture of PR-Q andPR-P by chromatography on a Brownlee Labs AX-300 HPLC ion-exchangecolumn, using a gradient of 10-250 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.0).

B. Amino Acid Sequence of PR-Q

Cyanogen bromide and tryptic peptides were made and purified by methodswell known in the art, and subjected to automated Edman degradation andanalysis.

C. Isolation and Cloning of PR-Q cDNA

Tobacco leaves were infected as described and harvested 5 days later.RNA was prepared by the method of Lagrimini et al. (1987) PNAS84:7542-7546, cDNA was made from it by the method of Gubler and Hoffman,(1983) Gene 25: 263-269, and the cDNA was cloned into the EcoRI site ofthe lambdaOngC phage vector available from Stratagene. The library wasplated and duplicate filter replicas made. The filters were probed withDNA encoding the tobacco basic chitinase Shinshi et al. (1987) PNAS84:89-93 under the following conditions: 125 MM NaCl/1% SDS/40 mM sodiumphosphate, pH 7.2/1 mM EDTA at 50° C.; washing was done under the sameconditions. Positive plaques were identified and isolated. The isolatedphage were plated again, and new duplicate sets of filters made. Thetobacco basic chitinase was again used as a probe, but this time thehybridization and washing were done in the previously described solutionat 65° C. Plaques which hybridized to the probe at 50° C., but eitherdid not or hybridized weakly at 65° C. were purified. DNA was isolatedfrom the purified phage, and the cDNA removed by digesting with EcoRI.The EcoRI fragment representing the cDNA was subcloned into the plasmidvector Bluescript, and its sequence determined by dideoxy sequencingusing the procedure for double-stranded templates. The identification ofthe clones as PR-Q was accomplished by comparing the predicted aminoacid sequence derived from the cDNA with the amino acid sequencedetermined from the purified protein. The cDNA sequence of PR-Q is shownas SEQ ID NO:7 of U.S. Pat. No.5,650,505.

D. Engineering PR-Q DNA into Plant Expression/Transformation Vectors

The full-length PR-Q cDNA was inserted into the EcoRI site of theplasmid pCGN1761, which placed it between a duplicated 35S RNA promoterderived from the cauliflower mosaic virus and transcription terminationsignals encoded by the 3' noncoding region of the tm1 gene of the samevirus. Recombinant plasmids were analyzed by restriction digest, and onethat contained the PR-Q cDNA in the orientation appropriate for theproduction of a translatable PR-Q-encoding message, pCIB 1022, waschosen for further constructions.

A DNA fragment containing the double CaMV promoter, PR-Q cDNA, and tm13' region was excised from pCIB1022 by digesting it with XbaI. It wasinserted into the XbaI site of the plasmid pCGN1540. The binary transfervector pCGN1540 contains a gentamycin resistance gene for selection inboth E. coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and pBR322 and PRiHRIorigins of replication. Insertion into the XbaI site places the PR-Qexpression cassette between DNA sequences corresponding to the right andleft borders of the Agrobacterium T-DNA, along with a cassette forexpression of the Tn5 neomycin phosphotransferase gene under the controlof the mannopine synthase promoter and bounded by the 3' non-codingregion of the mannopine synthase gene, and an E. coli lacZ gene forcolor production. The structure of the new plasmid, pCGN17991C, wasshown by restriction analysis to be the one in which the mas promoterand the double CaMV promoter would initiate transcription in the samedirection on the DNA template.

E. Transformation of Tobacco

Plasmid pCGN1791C was transformed into A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404.Transformation of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi.nc was by co-cultivationof the bacteria with leaf disks by standard methods. Transformed planttissue was selected by resistance to kanamycin, and was regenerated tointact plants (T1 plants) by standard methods. About twenty plants wereregenerated, starting with tissue that arose from independenttransformation events.

F. Production and Biochemical Characterization of Homozygous Plants

Small samples of leaf tissue were taken from each of the T1 plants anddenatured extracts from total leaf tissue were analyzed by SDS gels andWestern blots, using antisera raised against PR-Q protein. The materialfrom the transgenic plants that reacted with the antibody was comparedto that which came from TMV-treated, untransformed tobacco, to materialfrom untreated, untransformed tobacco, and to purified PR-Q protein onthe same blot. Transgenic plants that did not contain a significantamount of immunoreactive material that was the correct molecular weightwere discarded. The plants that were positive in this test were grown ina greenhouse until the flowering stage, and then they were individuallybagged to ensure that only self-fertilization took place. The resultingseeds (T2 generation) were harvested, and 100 seeds from each T1 plantwere scored for resistance to kanamycin by germinating them onantibiotic-containing medium. Plants that gave seeds exhibitingapproximately a 3:1 ratio of kanamycin resistance to sensitivity werejudged to contain a single locus of T-DNA insertion. 8-10 offspring fromeach of these plants were grown to the flowering stage and bagged.During the growth of these plants, leaf samples were taken and analyzedfor constitutive PR-Q expression as described. Based on these analyses,a lineage from one independent transformant was chosen as the one thataccumulated the largest amount of PR-Q (1791C-18). Seeds from theindividual T2 plants of this lineage were harvested and 100 were scoredfor kanamycin resistance. The complete absence of kanamycin sensitiveseeds in this assay indicated that the seeds were derived from a parenthomozygous for the transgene. Seed lot 1791C-18-2 was homozygous by thiscriterion, and was used for testing against pathogens.

Example 5 Test for Resistance to Cercospora nicotianae

Inoculum from C. nicotianae (ATCC strain 18366) was made by culturing aconidial suspension on CDV8 plates covered with sterile filter paperunder black lights at 18° C. for two weeks. The spores were collected bybrushing the filter paper in distilled water, and the sporeconcentration was adjusted to 100,000-150,000 spores per ml. Thesuspension was sprayed onto the upper surface of the leaves of8-week-old tobacco plants, which were then kept covered for 5-6 days bya plastic sheet to maintain high humidity. After that, the plants werekept moist by periodic spraying by an automatic system. The symptomsappeared 8-10 days later, and disease scores were obtained by recordingthe percent of leaf area infected by the fungus. The lesion mimicplants, 1791C-18-2, were significantly less infected than untransformedXanthi.nc plants.

II. Phenotypically Normal Constitutive Immunity (cim) Mutants

The class of mutants described in this section of examples correspondsto the "cim Class II" mutants described supra, which are also referredto herein as cim mutants.

Example 6 Isolation and Characterization of Phenotyically Normal cimMutants with Constitutive SAR Gene Expression

1100 individual M2 mutagenized (EMS) Arabidopsis plants were grown inAracon trays (Lehle Seeds, Round Rock, Tex.) in sets of approximately100. Plants were grown as described in Uknes et al. (1993) with specialattention given to avoid over-watering and pathogen infection. Briefly,Metro Mix 360 was saturated with water and autoclaved three times for 70minutes in 10-liter batches. The potting mix was stirred thoroughly inbetween each autoclaving. Seeds were surface sterilized in 20% Cloroxfor 5 minutes and washed with seven changes of sterile water beforesowing. Planted seeds were vernalized for 3-4 days followed by growth inchambers with a 9 hour day and 15 hour night at 22° C. When the plantswere three to four weeks old, one or two leaves, weighing 50 to 100 mg,were harvested and total RNA was isolated using a rapid, mini-RNApreparation (Verwoerd et al. (1989) Nuc. Acid Res. 17, 2362). PR-1 geneexpression was analyzed by Northern blot analysis (Lagrimini et al.(1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7542-7546; Ward et al. (1991)).Each set of plants also contained a non-treated A. thaliana Co1-0 and a2-day INA-treated (0.25 mg/ml) control. All plants were maintained asdescribed in Weymann et al., (1995).

80 putative mutants accumulating elevated levels of PR-1 mRNA wereidentified. Following progeny testing, five were chosen for furthercharacterization. Putative cim mutants displayed elevated SAR geneexpression in the absence of pathogen or inducing treatment. Progenytesting of the putative cim mutants confirmed that constitutive PR-1expression was heritable. Of the cim mutants, two, cim2 and cim3, withthe highest, most stable expression of PR-1 were characterized further.

Back crosses to Columbia utilized the recessive glabrous trait as amarker for identification of F1 progeny. Co1-g11 flower buds wereemasculated prior to pollen shed, and pollen from the mutants wasapplied immediately and the following day. F1 plants were grown in soiland the out crossed plants were identified by the presence of trichomes.

Following crosses of cim2 and cim3 to ecotype Co1-0 or La-er, a largeproportion of F1 plants were identified with high SAR gene expression,suggesting these traits were dominant. In the case of cim2, some, butnot all, F1 plants had constitutive SAR gene expression. Such a resultwould be expected if the cim2 mutant were dominant and carried as aheterozygote in the parent. Further genetic testing of cim2 showedcontinued variable segregation in the F2 generation, consistent withincomplete penetrance.

The heterozygous cim3 demonstrated a 1:1 segregation in the F1generation whereupon two individual F1 plants expressing a high level ofPR-1 mRNA were selfed to form an F2 population. F2 segregation, obtainedby scoring PR-1 mRNA accumulation, showed 93 F2 plants with high PR-1mRNA and 25 F2 plants without significant PR-1 mRNA accumulation givinga 3.7:1 ratio (C² =1.77; 0.5>P>0.1), which is consistent with thehypothesis that cim3 is a dominant, single gene mutation. Subsequentoutcrosses confirmed that cim3 was inherited as a dominant mutation.

For cim3, the original M2 plant identified in the screen and the M3population appeared normal. However, as the cim3 plants were selfed,some of the best expressing lines had low fertility. Following the backcross to Co1-g11, plants with normal appearance and fertility and strongPR-1 expression were obtained.

When initially identified, cim3 also appeared slightly dwarfed withthin, distorted leaves. However, F2 plants resulting from a cross withecotype Co1-g11 retained high SAR gene expression and could not bedistinguished from wild-type plants. This suggested that the dwarfed,distorted-leaf phenotype was caused by an independent mutation that wasnot associated with constitutive SAR gene expression. The cim3 mutantphenotype was also observed when plants were grown in sterile conditionsconfirming that PR-1 mRNA accumulation was not caused by a pathogen.

Example 7 SAR Gene Expression

In addition to PR-1, two other SAR genes, PR-2 and PR-5, were alsohighly expressed in cim3. Levels of SAR gene expression varied betweenthe progeny, but were always more than 10-fold higher than the untreatedcontrol and similar to the levels obtained following aresistance-inducing INA (0.25 mg/ml) treatment of wild-type plants.

Example 8 Salicylic Acid Analysis

Endogenous concentrations of SA have been shown to increase followingpathogen-induced necrosis in Arabidopsis (Uknes et al. (1993)).Salicylic acid and its glucose conjugate were analyzed as described inUknes et al. (1993). Leaf tissue was harvested from 10 cim3 and 10control, 4 week-old plants. Leaves from individual plants were harvestedand analyzed for PR-1 gene expression. SA levels were measured fromplants expressing PR-1. The concentration of free SA in cim3 was3.4-fold higher than in non-infected wild-type Arabidopsis (233±35 vs.69±8 ng/g fresh weight, respectively). The glucose conjugate of SA (SAG)was 13.1-fold higher in cim3 than in non-infected wild-type Arabidopsis(4519±473 vs. 344±58 ng/g fresh weight, respectively). These increasedlevels of SA and SAG are comparable to the levels that have beenreported for either pathogen-infected tissue or the cpr mutant (Bowlinget al., Plant Cell 6, 1845-1857 (1994)).

Example 9 Disease Resistance

cim3 was evaluated for resistance to Peronospora parasitica (NoCo2), thecausal agent of downy mildew disease of Arabidopsis. Thirty cim3(confirmed by PR-1 RNA expression) and thirty control plants (ecotypeColumbia), each about 4 weeks old, were inoculated with P. parasitica,as described in Uknes, et al. (1992). Seven days later, plants wereanalyzed for sporulation and stained with trypan blue to visualizefungal structures, as described in Keogh et al. (1980) Trans. Br. Mycol.Soc. 74, 329-333; and in Koch and Slusarenko (1990) Plant Cell 2,437-445. Wild-type (Co1-0) plants support the growth of hyphae, conidia,and oospores, while wild type plants treated with INA (0.25 mg/ml) andcim3 plants showed no fungal growth. The cim3-mediated resistance istypically seen as a small group of dead cells at the site of pathogeninfection. This type of resistance is similar to that seen in lsdmutants (Dietrich et al. (1994); Weymann et al., (1995)), or inwild-type plants in which SAR has been induced (Uknes et al. (1992)).Occasionally, intermediate resistance phenotypes were observed,including trailing necrosis in the wake of the hyphal tip in cim3plants. This trailing necrosis is similar to that found in wild-typeplants treated with low doses of SA or INA (Uknes et al. (1992); Ukneset al. (1993)). However, sporulation was never observed on cim3 plantswhile all control plants showed sporulation. No spontaneous lesions wereobserved on uninoculated cim3 leaves when stained with trypan blue.

In addition to resistance to the fungal pathogen P. parasitica, cim3 wasalso resistant to infection with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonassyringae DC3000. Six-week-old wild-type (±INA treatment) and cim3 plantswere inoculated with a suspension of P. syringae DC3000 and the progressof the disease was followed by monitoring the growth of the bacteriaextracted from infected leaves over time. The difference in bacterialtiters between Co1-O, Co1-O+INA, and cim3 at either day 0 or day 2 wasnot statistically significant. However, by day four, there was a 31-folddecrease in bacterial growth between wild-type and cim3 plants (P<0.003;Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). The plants were also visually inspected fordisease symptoms. Leaves from wild-type plants were severely chloroticwith disease symptoms spreading well beyond the initial zone ofinjection. In contrast, either wild-type plants pretreated with INA orcim3 plants were nearly devoid of disease symptoms.

For the experiments described herein, cultures of Pseudomonas syringaepv. tomato strain DC3000 were grown on King's B media (agar plates orliquid) plus rifampicin (50 μg/ml) at 28° C. (Walen et al. (1991) PlantCell 3, 49-59). An overnight culture was diluted and resuspended in 10mM MgCl₂ to a density of 2-5×10⁵ cells per ml and injected intoArabidopsis leaves. Injections were carried out by creating a small holewith a 28 gauge needle midway up the leaf and then injectingapproximately 250 μl of the diluted bacterial solution with a 1 ccsyringe. At various time points, 10 random samples consisting of 3random leaf punches from a #1 cork borer were taken from 10 plants fromeach treatment. The 3 leaf punches were placed in an eppendorf tube with300 μl of 10 mM MgCl₂ and ground with a pestle. The resulting bacterialsuspension was appropriately diluted and plated on King's B media plusrifampicin (50 μg/ml) and grown for 4 days at 28° C. Bacterial colonieswere counted and the data were subjected to Student's t statisticalanalysis (Sokal and Rohlf (1981), Biometry, 2^(nd) ed. New York: W. H.Freeman and Company).

Also for the experiments described herein, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid(INA) was suspended in sterile, distilled water as a 25% activeingredient formulated in a wettable powder (0.25 mg/ml, 325 μM; Kessmannet al. (1994) Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 32, 439-59). All plants weresprayed with water or INA solutions to the point of imminent runoff.

Example 10 The Role of SA in SAR Gene Expression and Disease Resistance

To investigate the relationship between SA, SAR gene expression, andresistance in cim3, crosses were carried out with Arabidopsis plantsexpressing the salicylate hydroxylase (nahG) gene (Delaney et al.(1994)). These "NahG plants" were made by transformation of the 35Sdriven nahG gene into Arabidopsis using Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation. See, Huang, H. Ma, H. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 10,372-383, herein incorporated by reference; Gaffney, et al. (1993)Science 261, 754-756, herein incorporated by reference; and Delaney, etal. (1994) Science 266, 1247-1250, herein incorporated by reference.Col-nahG Arabidopsis carries a dominant kanamycin resistance gene inaddition to the dominant nahG gene, so Co1-nahG was used as the pollendonor. F1 seed was hydrated in water for 30 minutes and then surfacesterilized in 10% Clorox, 0.05% Tween 20 for five minutes, and washedthoroughly in sterile water. Seeds were plated onto germination media(GM, Murashige and Skoog medium containing 10 g/L sucrose buffered with0.5 g/L 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, pH 5.7 with KOH)containing 25 mg/ml kanamycin to select for F₁ plants. See, Valvekens etal. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 85, 5536-5540.Kanamycin-resistant F₁ plants were transferred to soil after 18 days.The presence of the nahG gene and PR-1 expression was confirmed in allexperiments by Northern blot analysis.

Because both the cim3 mutant and nahG phenotypes are dominant, epistasisbetween the two genes could be analyzed in F1 plants. Seventy F1 plantsfrom a cim3 X nahG cross were analyzed for PR-1 and nahG geneexpression. In Northern blot analysis of mRNA expression, the presenceof the nahG gene correlated with suppressed SAR gene expression. Thepresence of cim3 in each F1 was confirmed by assessing PR-1 mRNA in theresulting F2 segregants.

To determine if the cim3 mutation was epistatic to nahG with respect todisease resistance, 5 F1 plants from the cim3 X nahG cross, which hadbeen confirmed for the presence of nahG and absence of PR-1 mRNA, wereselfed, and 20-30 F2 seed were planted. Expression of nahG and PR-1 mRNAwas analyzed in individuals from this F2 population, which were thenchallenged with P. parasitica (NoCo2) to assess their diseasesusceptibility. Disease resistance conferred by cim3 was eliminated bythe presence of the nahG gene, demonstrating that nahG is epistatic tocim3 for SAR gene expression and the disease resistance phenotype.

Example 11 Construction of a Transgenic Plant Line Harboring a ChimericPR-1 Promoter/Luciferase (PR-1/luc) Construct

A. Construction of the PR-1/Luciferase Chimeric Gene

A PR-1 genomic clone was identified by screening an Arabidopsis EMBL 3genomic library (Clontech) with the PR-1 cDNA (Uknes et al. (1992)). A 7kb XhoI fragment of the PR-1 genomic clone was subcloned into pBS+(Stratagene) using standard cloning techniques (Sambrook et al. (1989)).Restriction mapping revealed the presence of a 4.2 kb promoter fragment5' of the PR-1 coding region (U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,395). This fragmentwas sequenced and subcloned 5' to a cDNA coding for firefly luciferase(excised from pDO432; Ow et al. (1986) Science, 235: 856-859) generatinga translational fusion at the ATG that marks the start of translationfor luciferase. No terminator sequence was added because the fireflyluciferase gene contains an consensus polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) 3'of the stop codon of luciferase that is recognized as terminator oftranscription in plants. The PR-1/luciferase construct was verified bysequencing and subcloned as a XboI/SacI fragment into pCIB200, a binaryvector that contains the neomycinphosphotransferase II gene that confersresistance to kanamycin. The resulting construct was transformed intoAgrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation (Holsters etal. (1978) Molec. Gen. Genet. 163, 181-187). The DNA sequence of thechimeric PR-1/luc construct is presented as SEQ ID NO: 1.

B. Transgenic Plants

Arabidopsis plants were transformed with either PR-1/luciferase(ecotypes Co1-O and Dijon) or 35S/nahG (ecotype Dijon) by Agrobacteriumusing the vacuum-infiltration method (Bechtold et al. (1993) ComptesRendus de l'Academie des Sciences (Paris) 316, 1194-1199) or by roottransformation. For each line, at least 32 independent transformantshomozygous for the transgene were identified based on resistance of theT3 progeny to kanamycin (PR-1/luciferase) or hygromycin (35S/nahG).Co1-O was chosen as a suitable background for genetic analysis and Dijonhas the advantage that inoculation with the viral pathogen turnipcrinkle virus (TCV) triggers a hypersensitive response (Uknes et al.(1993) MPMI 6, 692-698).

Example 12 Induction of Luciferase Activity in Transgenic Plants

A. Chemical Induction

PR-1/luc plants were characterized based on inducibility of luciferaseactivity by 375 μM INA. Lines that consistently showed more than1000-fold inducibility (6E in Co1-O and B1 in Dijon) were selected forfurther experimentation. A 35S/nahG line in the Dijon ecotype wasselected as described in Lawton et al. (1995).

For determination of chemical inducibility of luciferase activity, 6Eplants were sprayed with three known chemical activators of SAR:SA (5mM), INA (375 μM), or BTH (375 μM and 5 mM). In vitro luciferaseactivity was determined every 24 hours during a period of four days. Foreach measurement, six samples consisting of six leaves each wereharvested. INA and BTH treatment at the standard concentration of 375 μMcaused an induction of luciferase of more than 2000 fold within 48hours; this level was maintained for at least two more days. Incontrast, treatment with 5 mM SA led to a 5000 fold induction ofluciferase activity within 24 hours, which was followed by a declinethat was possibly due to inactivation of SA. Treatment with 5 mM BTHcaused an induction similar to SA, but no pronounced decline of activitywas observed within the first four days.

RNA was extracted from the same tissue samples used for luciferasedetermination, and PR-1 mRNA levels were visualized by Northernblotting. Induction of PR-1 mRNA and luciferase correlatedquantitatively, indicating that luciferase activity reflects PR-1transcription in these plants. To test whether the onset of SAR geneexpression could be monitored in vivo, PR-1/luc plants were treated with0.375 μM BTH and sprayed with luciferin 2 days after treatment. Lightemission was followed using a sensitive photon-imaging system (Argus 50software, video camera model XC77, Hamamatsu Inc., Bridgewater, N.J.,USA). Light emission of seedlings grown in vitro could be detectedwithin 2 minutes.

B. Biological Induction

To determine biological inducibility of luciferase activity, both the B1and a B1-nahG line were inoculated with TCV, and luciferase activity wasmeasured over a time course of 9 days. For each measurement, six samplesconsisting of six leaves each were harvested from both inoculated leavesand secondary non-inoculated leaves of treated B1 and B1-nahG plants.Infected leaves of B1 plants displayed a linear increase in luciferaseactivity following a 1 day lag period similar to the accumulation ofPR-1 mRNA in the same tissue. The same treatment of B1-nahG plants ledto a comparably small increase of luciferase after 9 days. In thesystemic leaves of TCV-treated plants, a clear induction of bothluciferase activity and PR-1 mRNA was observed by 5 days. This inductionwas found only in the B1, not in the B1-nahG line, supporting the theorythat SA is required for signal transduction in SAR (Gaffney et al.(1993)).

Taken as a whole, the above data demonstrates that induction of SAR geneexpression can be monitored by following luciferase activity in PR-1/lucplants.

Example 13 In Vivo Monitoring of SAR Gene Expression

To determine whether the onset of SAR gene expression could be monitoredin vivo, PR-1/luc plants (Dijon) were inoculated with TCV. Nine daysafter treatment, the plants were sprayed with luciferin. Light emissionof systemic non-infected leaves of TCV-treated plants was detectedwithin two minutes, whereas leaves of mock inoculated plants could notbe recognized following integration of photon emission over a one hourperiod. The three TCV-inoculated leaves emitted 10 to 50 times morephotons than uninfected leaves. Chemical induction of SAR geneexpression led to a more uniform distribution of light emission,indicating that the pattern observed after TCV treatment was not due toan artifact such as uneven distribution of luciferin but reflects abiological phenomenon in SAR.

Example 14 PR-1/luc Screen for cim Mutants

The PR-1/luc line (Co1-O) was mutagenized by EMS (0.2% EMS, 12 hrs, 23°C., p-value=0.136, Lehle Seeds, Tucson, Ariz.). 168 pooled M1populations were planted for M2 seeds. M2 populations were screened withmore than 99% coverage of the M1 pool for constitutive expression of thePR-1/luciferase reporter gene. Four weeks old siblings were misted witha 7.5 mM luciferin solution and after a 10 min incubation, photonemission was integrated for 10 min in a photon imaging device (HamamatsuInc., Tokyo) equipped with an ARGUS 50 photon counting image processorat the most sensitive level.

Out of 250,000 plants screened, 605 plants showed high levels ofluciferase activity in the screen. Luciferase activity in vivo wasconfirmed by a luciferase in vitro assay. One leaf was ground in 500 μlphosphate buffer (pH 7.8) at 4° C., 100 μl were mixed with 100 μlcommercial luciferase substrate (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.), andphoton emission was counted for 10 sec in a luminometer Monolight 2010(Analytical Luminescence Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Mich.). 249 of the 605mutants were lethal or sterile; the remaining 356 were retested forluciferase activity in the next generation.

266 mutants displayed visible lesion formation, whereas 90 mutants didnot display obvious spontaneous cell death. The 90 mutants (derived from82 different M2 groups) were analyzed for PR-1 mRNA levels by Northernblotting, resistance to the virulent pathogen Peronospora parasitica pvNoco2 (scored 8 days after inoculation with 10⁵ spores/ml), salicylicacid levels, and lesion formation by staining with the viable stainlactophenol trypan blue. All 90 mutants displayed both elevatedluciferase activity and elevated levels of PR-1 mRNA. Interestingly, nomutant was identified where luciferase and PR-1 expression wasuncoupled.

To clearly distinguish between cim's and lsd's, leaves of all 90 mutantswere subjected to trypan blue staining, which reveals areas ofspontaneous cell death (Dietrich et al. (1994)). Even though the 90mutants were preselected against obvious lesion formation, 74 mutantswere found to belong to the lsd class (cim class I). 16 mutants (derivedfrom 16 different M2 groups) were assigned to the cim class (cim classII or III), as no spontaneous cell death was detectable under severalgrowth conditions (long day or short day; high light or low lightintensity). These data demonstrate that careful analysis is requiredbefore a mutant is claimed to show constitutive immunity in the absenceof spontaneous lesion formation.

SAR gene expression, resistance to P. parasitica NoCo2, and SA levelswere examined to further investigate if this set of 90 mutants wasaffected in SAR signal transduction. SAR gene expression was determinedby examination of the three marker genes PR-1, PR-2, and PR-5 (Uknes etal. (1992)) in mutants belonging to the cim class and the lsd class.Both cim and lsd mutants display elevated levels of not only PR-1, butalso PR-2 and PR-5 mRNA similar to levels reached in a BTH treatedplant, which suggests that increased luciferase activity reflectscoordinated induction of SAR genes. All cim's and all lsd's were foundto show increased resistance to P. parasitica consistent with aphenotype of constitutive SAR. All of the cim's and lsd's investigatedalso displayed elevated levels of salicylic acid, suggesting that thesemutations cause elevated levels of SA, which subsequently triggersactivation of SAR.

cim mutants were also crossed to NahG plants as described earlier, whichresulted in decreased SA accumulation as expected. Interestingly, onecim mutant isolated through the PR-1/luc screen remained resistant to P.parasitica even with the decreased SA accumulation resulting from thecross to the NahG plant line. Such disease resistance exhibition despitedecreased SA accumulation suggests that this particular cim mutant maybelong to cim class III.

Example 15 Disease Resistance Against Erysiphe cichoracearum

cim's were evaluated for resistance to Erisyphe cichoracearum, thecausal agent of powdery mildew disease of Arabidopsis. Four-week old,confirmed cim mutant plants, Co1-0 plants, confirmed cim-mutant plantstreated with 0.3 mM BTH (two days before inoculation), and Co1-0 plantstreated with 0.3 mM BTH (two days before inoculation) were inoculated tohigh density with Erysiphe cichoracearum, as described in Adam andSomerville (1996) Plant Journal 9 (3), 341-356. Ten days later, diseaseprogression was quantified by counting infected leaves: 0-1 infectedleaf per plant=rating 1; 2-4 infected leaves=rating 2;≧5 leavesinfected=rating 3. In addition, fungal hyphal growth was visualized by afluorescent dye staining, 3,3'-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (Duckettand Read (1991) New Phytol. 118, 259-272), as described in Shunyuan etal. (1997) Plant Journal 12(4), 757-768. Co1-0 plants supported thegrowth of Erysiphe cichoracearum (rating 2.9 or above), while allBTH-treated plants exhibited complete resistance (rating 1.0). Severalcim mutants mimicked this resistance (rating 1.1-1.5).

III. Non-Inducible Immunity (nim) Mutants

The class of mutants described in this section do not express SAR genes,even when induced by a pathogen. Consequently, these mutants have auniversal disease susceptible (UDS) phenotype.

Example 16 Use of nim Mutants in Disease Testing

nim mutants are challenged with numerous pathogens and found to developlarger lesions more quickly than wild-type plants. This phenotype isreferred to as UDS (i.e. universal disease susceptible) and is a resultof the mutants failing to express SAR genes to effect the plant defenseagainst pathogens. The UDS phenotype of nim mutants renders them usefulas control plants for the evaluation of disease symptoms in experimentallines in field pathogenesis tests where the natural resistance phenotypeof so-called wild-type lines may vary (i.e. to different pathogens anddifferent pathotypes of the same pathogen). Thus, in a field environmentwhere natural infection by pathogens is being relied upon to assess theresistance of experimental lines, the incorporation into the experimentof nim mutant lines of the appropriate crop plant species would enablean assessment of the true level and spectrum of pathogen pressure,without the variation inherent in the use of non-experimental lines.

Example 17 Assessment of the Utility of Transgenes for the Purposes ofDisease Resistance

nim mutants are used as host plants for the transformation of transgenesto facilitate their assessment for use in disease resistance. A nimmutant line, characterized by its UDS phenotype, is used for subsequenttransformations with candidate genes for disease resistance thusenabling an assessment of the contribution of an individual gene toresistance against the basal level of the UDS nim mutant plants.Preferably, an Arabidopsis nim mutant line is used; however, UDSphenotype plants of any species may be used as well.

Example 18 nim Mutants as a Tool in Understanding Plant-PathogenInteractions

nim mutants are useful for the understanding of plant pathogeninteractions, and in particular for the understanding of the processesutilized by the pathogen for the invasion of plant cells. This is sobecause nim mutants do not mount a systemic response to pathogen attack,and the unabated development of the pathogen is an ideal scenario inwhich to study its biological interaction with the host.

Of further significance is the observation that a host nim mutant may besusceptible to pathogens not normally associated with that particularhost, but instead associated with a different host. For example,Arabidopsis nim mutants are characterized by the UDS phenotype. Theseplants are challenged with a number of pathogens that normally onlyinfect tobacco, and found to be susceptible. Thus, the nim mutationcausing the UDS phenotype leads to a modification of pathogen-rangesusceptibility and this has significant utility in the molecular,genetic and biochemical analysis of host-pathogen interaction.

Example 19 nim Mutants for Use in Fungicide Screening

nim mutants are particularly useful in the screening of new chemicalcompounds for fungicide activity. nim mutants selected in a particularhost have considerable utility for the screening of fungicides usingthat host and pathogens of the host. The advantage lies in the UDSphenotype of the mutant that circumvents the problems encountered by thehost being differentially susceptible to different pathogens andpathotypes, or even resistant to some pathogens or pathotypes. By way ofexample nim mutants in wheat could be effectively used to screen forfungicides to a wide range of wheat pathogens and pathotypes as themutants would not mount a resistance response to the introduced pathogenand would not display differential resistance to different pathotypesthat might otherwise require the use of multiple wheat lines, eachadequately susceptible to a particular test pathogen. Wheat pathogens ofparticular interest include (but are not limited to) Erisyphe graminis(the causative agent of powdery mildew), Rhizoctonia solani (thecausative agent of sharp eyespot), Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides(the causative agent of eyespot), Puccinia spp. (the causative agents ofrusts), and Septoria nodorum. Similarly, nim mutants of corn would behighly susceptible to corn pathogens and therefore useful in thescreening for fungicides with activity against corn diseases.

nim mutants have further utility for the screening of a wide range ofpathogens and pathotypes in a heterologous host i.e. in a host that maynot normally be within the host species range of a particular pathogenand that may be particularly easily to manipulate (such as Arabidopsis).By virtue of its UDS phenotype the heterologous host is susceptible topathogens of other plant species, including economically important cropplant species. Thus, by way of example, the same Arabidopsis nim mutantcould be infected with a wheat pathogen such as Erisyphe graminis (thecausative agent of powdery mildew) or a corn pathogen such asHelminthosporium maydis and used to test the efficacy of fungicidecandidates. Such an approach has considerable improvements in efficiencyover currently used procedures of screening individual crop plantspecies and different cultivars of species with different pathogens andpathotypes that may be differentially virulent on the different cropplant cultivars. Furthermore, the use of Arabidopsis has advantagesbecause of its small size and the possibility of thereby undertakingmore tests with limited resources of space.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail byway of illustration and example for purposes of clarity ofunderstanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modificationsmay be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

    __________________________________________________________________________    #             SEQUENCE LISTING                                                   - -  - - (1) GENERAL INFORMATION:                                             - -    (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 1                                           - -  - - (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1:                                     - -      (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:                                                 (A) LENGTH: 14113 base - #pairs                                               (B) TYPE: nucleic acid                                                        (C) STRANDEDNESS: single                                                      (D) TOPOLOGY: linear                                                 - -     (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid                                         (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc - #= "PR-1/luc construct"                     - -     (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1:                               - - GCGGTATCGG TGCAGATTAT TTGGATTGAG AGTGAATATG AGACTCTAAT TG -            #GATACCGA     60                                                                 - - GGGGAATTTA TGGAACGTCA GTGGAGCATT TTTGACAAGA AATATTTGCT AG -            #CTGATAGT    120                                                                 - - GACCTTAGGC GACTTTTGAA CGCGCAATAA TGGTTTCTGA CGTATGTGCT TA -            #GCTCATTA    180                                                                 - - AACTCCAGAA ACCCGCGGCT GAGTGGCTCC TTCAACGTTG CGGTTCTGTC AG -            #TTCCAAAC    240                                                                 - - GTAAAACGGC TTGTCCCGCG TCATCGGCGG GGGTCATAAC GTGACTCCCT TA -            #ATTCTCCG    300                                                                 - - CTCATGATCA GATTGTCGTT TCCCGCCTTC AGTTTAAACT ATCAGTGTTT GA -            #CAGGATAT    360                                                                 - - ATTGGCGGGT AAACCTAAGA GAAAAGAGCG TTTATTAGAA TAATCGGATA TT -            #TAAAAGGG    420                                                                 - - CGTGAAAAGG TTTATCCGTT CGTCCATTTG TATGTGCATG CCAACCACAG GG -            #TTCCCCTC    480                                                                 - - GGGAGTGCTT GGCATTCCGT GCGATAATGA CTTCTGTTCA ACCACCCAAA CG -            #TCGGAAAG    540                                                                 - - CCTGACGACG GAGCAGCATT CCAAAAAGAT CCCTTGGCTC GTCTGGGTCG GC -            #TAGAAGGT    600                                                                 - - CGAGTGGGCT GCTGTGGCTT GATCCCTCAA CGCGGTCGCG GACGTAGCGC AG -            #CGCCGAAA    660                                                                 - - AATCCTCGAT CGCAAATCCG ACGCTGTCGA AAAGCGTGAT CTGCTTGTCG CT -            #CTTTCGGC    720                                                                 - - CGACGTCCTG GCCAGTCATC ACGCGCCAAA GTTCCGTCAC AGGATGATCT GG -            #CGCGAGTT    780                                                                 - - GCTGGATCTC GCCTTCAATC CGGGTCTGTG GCGGGAACTC CACGAAAATA TC -            #CGAACGCA    840                                                                 - - GCAAGATCCC TTTCCGACGC TCACCGGGCT GGTTGCCCTC GCCGCTGGGC TG -            #GCGGCCGT    900                                                                 - - CTATGGCCCT GCAAACGCGC CAGAAACGCC GTCGAAGCCG TGTGCGAGAC AC -            #CGCGGCCG    960                                                                 - - CCGGCGTTGT GGATACCTCG CGGAAAACTT GGCCCTCACT GACAGATGAG GG -            #GCGGACGT   1020                                                                 - - TGACACTTGA GGGGCCGACT CACCCGGCGC GGCGTTGACA GATGAGGGGC AG -            #GCTCGATT   1080                                                                 - - TCGGCCGGCG ACGTGGAGCT GGCCAGCCTC GCAAATCGGC GAAAACGCCT GA -            #TTTTACGC   1140                                                                 - - GAGTTTCCCA CAGATGATGT GGACAAGCCT GGGGATAAGT GCCCTGCGGT AT -            #TGACACTT   1200                                                                 - - GAGGGGCGCG ACTACTGACA GATGAGGGGC GCGATCCTTG ACACTTGAGG GG -            #CAGAGTGC   1260                                                                 - - TGACAGATGA GGGGCGCACC TATTGACATT TGAGGGGCTG TCCACAGGCA GA -            #AAATCCAG   1320                                                                 - - CATTTGCAAG GGTTTCCGCC CGTTTTTCGG CCACCGCTAA CCTGTCTTTT AA -            #CCTGCTTT   1380                                                                 - - TAAACCAATA TTTATAAACC TTGTTTTTAA CCAGGGCTGC GCCCTGTGCG CG -            #TGACCGCG   1440                                                                 - - CACGCCGAAG GGGGGTGCCC CCCCTTCTCG AACCCTCCCG GCCCGCTAAC GC -            #GGGCCTCC   1500                                                                 - - CATCCCCCCA GGGGCTGCGC CCCTCGGCCG CGAACGGCCT CACCCCAAAA AT -            #GGCAGCCA   1560                                                                 - - AGCTTCGGGC TGAAATTGCA GGACAACTGG TGAGTCTGGA TCTGAAGTTG AA -            #TAGTGTCA   1620                                                                 - - TGGATGATCT GGACCGACTG GAGCCATCCC CAAGGTGGCG GAAGAGTTCC AG -            #CGTGGTGG   1680                                                                 - - GTAGCAGTAG CCCGATATGC CCCGGTTGAC CCAAAGTGTC TGTTATGACA GG -            #CAGATTAT   1740                                                                 - - CAACTCATGC CGTTGAACAT AGGCTGAATA TCGAAGATGG CAGCCGTTAT CT -            #CCAGAAAA   1800                                                                 - - TCATTCAGCT TAGTTTTAAA TTACCCCGAC CTGAAGCCTT TGATTTACGT AA -            #TGAATTTC   1860                                                                 - - GCCAGCGGGC TGAGGCTCTA TATCAGCAAA TTAATAATCA ACCGCCAGAC TC -            #TGGAATGG   1920                                                                 - - TAAGGGATCT CATCGCGGTG ACTGATACCT ATGGTGCCGC ACTTTCGACG CC -            #ACGGGAAA   1980                                                                 - - TCCATCAGGC CATTAATTCC CTGATTTTTC TTTATCCGGG GATGCGGGAT TT -            #TGTTTATT   2040                                                                 - - TCCCTGATTT GTGCCTGCTT CAGCTTATAC GGGTGACAAA CCCGGCTCTG TA -            #TGACTGGA   2100                                                                 - - CAGAGCATTA CCTGACAGAA CGGTCCGTGA TTGAAACCGG TCAGGGTATG CT -            #TTCTGACG   2160                                                                 - - GAGAGAAAGC AGACTTCCGG GAGGGGCTTA TCAGATGTAT GAAGACGTTC AG -            #GGCATCAA   2220                                                                 - - ATGCAGACTC GTTTCTGACA CTTGCAGACT GGATCTATCT CATCTGCGCA AG -            #GCAGAACG   2280                                                                 - - TGAAGACGGC CGCCCTGGAC CTCGCCCGCG AGCGCCAGGC GCACGAGGCC GG -            #CGCGCGGA   2340                                                                 - - CCCGCGCCAC GGCCCACGAG CGGACGCCGC AGCAGGAGCG CCAGAAGGCC GC -            #CAGAGAGG   2400                                                                 - - CCGAGCGCGG CCGTGAGGCT TGGACGCTAG GGCAGGGCAT GAAAAAGCCC GT -            #AGCGGGCT   2460                                                                 - - GCTACGGGCG TCTGACGCGG TGGAAAGGGG GAGGGGATGT TGTCTACATG GC -            #TCTGCTGT   2520                                                                 - - AGTGAGTGGG TTGCGCTCCG GCAGCGGTCC TGATCAATCG TCACCCTTTC TC -            #GGTCCTTC   2580                                                                 - - AACGTTCCTG ACAACGAGCC TCCTTTTCGC CAATCCATCG ACAATCACCG CG -            #AGTCCCTG   2640                                                                 - - CTCGAACGCT GCGTCCGGAC CGGCTTCGTC GAAGGCGTCT ATCGCGGCCC GC -            #AACAGCGG   2700                                                                 - - CGAGAGCGGA GCCTGTTCAA CGGTGCCGCC GCGCTCGCCG GCATCGCTGT CG -            #CCGGCCTG   2760                                                                 - - CTCCTCAAGC ACGGCCCCAA CAGTGAAGTA GCTGATTGTC ATCAGCGCAT TG -            #ACGGCGTC   2820                                                                 - - CCCGGCCGAA AAACCCGCCT CGCAGAGGAA GCGAAGCTGC GCGTCGGCCG TT -            #TCCATCTG   2880                                                                 - - CGGTGCGCCC GGTCGCGTGC CGGCATGGAT GCGCGCGCCA TCGCGGTAGG CG -            #AGCAGCGC   2940                                                                 - - CTGCCTGAAG CTGCGGGCAT TCCCGATCAG AAATGAGCGC CAGTCGTCGT CG -            #GCTGTCGG   3000                                                                 - - CACCGAATGC GTATGATTCT CCGCCAGCAT GGCTTCGGCC AGTGCGTCGA GC -            #AGCGCCCG   3060                                                                 - - CTTGTTCCTG AAGTGCCAGT AAAGCGCCGG CTGCTGAACC CCCAACCGTT CC -            #GCCAGTTT   3120                                                                 - - GCGTGTCGTC AGACCGTCTA CGCCGACCTC GTTCAACAGG TCCAGGGCGG CA -            #CGGATCAC   3180                                                                 - - TGTATTCGGC TGCAACTTTG TCATGCTTGA CACTTTATCA CTGATAAACA TA -            #ATATGTCC   3240                                                                 - - ACCAACTTAT CAGTGATAAA GAATCCGCGC GTTCAATCGG ACCAGCGGAG GC -            #TGGTCCGG   3300                                                                 - - AGGCCAGACG TGAAACCCAA CATACCCCTG ATCGTAATTC TGAGCACTGT CG -            #CGCTCGAC   3360                                                                 - - GCTGTCGGCA TCGGCCTGAT TATGCCGGTG CTGCCGGGCC TCCTGCGCGA TC -            #TGGTTCAC   3420                                                                 - - TCGAACGACG TCACCGCCCA CTATGGCATT CTGCTGGCGC TGTATGCGTT GG -            #TGCAATTT   3480                                                                 - - GCCTGCGCAC CTGTGCTGGG CGCGCTGTCG GATCGTTTCG GGCGGCGGCC AA -            #TCTTGCTC   3540                                                                 - - GTCTCGCTGG CCGGCGACCT GCAGGGGGGG GGGGGAAAGC CACGTTGTGT CT -            #CAAAATCT   3600                                                                 - - CTGATGTTAC ATTGCACAAG ATAAAAATAT ATCATCATGA ACAATAAAAC TG -            #TCTGCTTA   3660                                                                 - - CATAAACAGT AATACAAGGG GTGTTATGAG CCATATTCAA CGGGAAACGT CT -            #TGCTCGAG   3720                                                                 - - GCCGCGATTA AATTCCAACA TGGATGCTGA TTTATATGGG TATAAATGGG CT -            #CGCGATAA   3780                                                                 - - TGTCGGGCAA TCAGGTGCGA CAATCTATCG ATTGTATGGG AAGCCCGATG CG -            #CCAGAGTT   3840                                                                 - - GTTTCTGAAA CATGGCAAAG GTAGCGTTGC CAATGATGTT ACAGATGAGA TG -            #GTCAGACT   3900                                                                 - - AAACTGGCTG ACGGAATTTA TGCCTCTTCC GACCATCAAG CATTTTATCC GT -            #ACTCCTGA   3960                                                                 - - TGATGCATGG TTACTCACCA CTGCGATCCC CGGGAAAACA GCATTCCAGG TA -            #TTAGAAGA   4020                                                                 - - ATATCCTGAT TCAGGTGAAA ATATTGTTGA TGCGCTGGCA GTGTTCCTGC GC -            #CGGTTGCA   4080                                                                 - - TTCGATTCCT GTTTGTAATT GTCCTTTTAA CAGCGATCGC GTATTTCGTC TC -            #GCTCAGGC   4140                                                                 - - GCAATCACGA ATGAATAACG GTTTGGTTGA TGCGAGTGAT TTTGATGACG AG -            #CGTAATGG   4200                                                                 - - CTGGCCTGTT GAACAAGTCT GGAAAGAAAT GCATAAGCTT TTGCCATTCT CA -            #CCGGATTC   4260                                                                 - - AGTCGTCACT CATGGTGATT TCTCACTTGA TAACCTTATT TTTGACGAGG GG -            #AAATTAAT   4320                                                                 - - AGGTTGTATT GATGTTGGAC GAGTCGGAAT CGCAGACCGA TACCAGGATC TT -            #GCCATCCT   4380                                                                 - - ATGGAACTGC CTCGGTGAGT TTTCTCCTTC ATTACAGAAA CGGCTTTTTC AA -            #AAATATGG   4440                                                                 - - TATTGATAAT CCTGATATGA ATAAATTGCA GTTTCATTTG ATGCTCGATG AG -            #TTTTTCTA   4500                                                                 - - ATCAGAATTG GTTAATTGGT TGTAACACTG GCAGAGCATT ACGCTGACTT GA -            #CGGGACGG   4560                                                                 - - CGGCTTTGTT GAATAAATCG AACTTTTGCT GAGTTGAAGG ATCAGATCAC GC -            #ATCTTCCC   4620                                                                 - - GACAACGCAG ACCGTTCCGT GGCAAAGCAA AAGTTCAAAA TCACCAACTG GT -            #CCACCTAC   4680                                                                 - - AACAAAGCTC TCATCAACCG TGGCTCCCTC ACTTTCTGGC TGGATGATGG GG -            #CGATTCAG   4740                                                                 - - GCCTGGTATG AGTCAGCAAC ACCTTCTTCA CGAGGCAGAC CTCAGCGCCC CC -            #CCCCCCCT   4800                                                                 - - GCAGGTCGCC GAATGCCACG GCATCTCGCA ACCGTTCAGC GAACGCCTCC AT -            #GGGCTTTT   4860                                                                 - - TCTCCTCGTG CTCGTAAACG GACCCGAACA TCTCTGGAGC TTTCTTCAGG GC -            #CGACAATC   4920                                                                 - - GGATCTCGCG GAAATCCTGC ACGTCGGCCG CTCCAAGCCG TCGAATCTGA GC -            #CTTAATCA   4980                                                                 - - CAATTGTCAA TTTTAATCCT CTGTTTATCG GCAGTTCGTA GAGCGCGCCG TG -            #CGTCCCGA   5040                                                                 - - GCGATACTGA GCGAAGCAAG TGCGTCGAGC AGTGCCCGCT TGTTCCTGAA AT -            #GCCAGTAA   5100                                                                 - - AGCGCTGGCT GCTGAACCCC CAGCCGGAAC TGACCCCACA AGGCCCTAGC GT -            #TTGCAATG   5160                                                                 - - CACCAGGTCA TCATTGACCC AGGCGTGTTC CACCAGGCCG CTGCCTCGCA AC -            #TCTTCGCA   5220                                                                 - - GGCTTCGCCG ACCTGCTCGC GCCACTTCTT CACGCGGGTG GAATCCGATC CG -            #CACATGAG   5280                                                                 - - GCGGAAGGTT TCCAGCTTGA GCGGGTACGG CTCCCGGTGC GAGCTGAAAT AG -            #TCGAACAT   5340                                                                 - - CCGTCGGGCC GTCGGCGACA GCTTGCGGTA CTTCTCCCAT ATGAATTTCG TG -            #TAGTGGTC   5400                                                                 - - GCCAGCAAAC AGCACGACGA TTTCCTCGTC GATCAGGACC TGGCAACGGG AC -            #GTTTTCTT   5460                                                                 - - GCCACGGTCC AGGACGCGGA AGCGGTGCAG CAGCGACACC GATTCCAGGT GC -            #CCAACGCG   5520                                                                 - - GTCGGACGTG AAGCCCATCG CCGTCGCCTG TAGGCGCGAC AGGCATTCCT CG -            #GCCTTCGT   5580                                                                 - - GTAATACCGG CCATTGATCG ACCAGCCCAG GTCCTGGCAA AGCTCGTAGA AC -            #GTGAAGGT   5640                                                                 - - GATCGGCTCG CCGATAGGGG TGCGCTTCGC GTACTCCAAC ACCTGCTGCC AC -            #ACCAGTTC   5700                                                                 - - GTCATCGTCG GCCCGCAGCT CGACGCCGGT GTAGGTGATC TTCACGTCCT TG -            #TTGACGTG   5760                                                                 - - GAAAATGACC TTGTTTTGCA GCGCCTCGCG CGGGATTTTC TTGTTGCGCG TG -            #GTGAACAG   5820                                                                 - - GGCAGAGCGG GCCGTGTCGT TTGGCATCGC TCGCATCGTG TCCGGCCACG GC -            #GCAATATC   5880                                                                 - - GAACAAGGAA AGCTGCATTT CCTTGATCTG CTGCTTCGTG TGTTTCAGCA AC -            #GCGGCCTG   5940                                                                 - - CTTGGCCTCG CTGACCTGTT TTGCCAGGTC CTCGCCGGCG GTTTTTCGCT TC -            #TTGGTCGT   6000                                                                 - - CATAGTTCCT CGCGTGTCGA TGGTCATCGA CTTCGCCAAA CCTGCCGCCT CC -            #TGTTCGAG   6060                                                                 - - ACGACGCGAA CGCTCCACGG CGGCCGATGG CGCGGGCAGG GCAGGGGGAG CC -            #AGTTGCAC   6120                                                                 - - GCTGTCGCGC TCGATCTTGG CCGTAGCTTG CTGGACCATC GAGCCGACGG AC -            #TGGAAGGT   6180                                                                 - - TTCGCGGGGC GCACGCATGA CGGTGCGGCT TGCGATGGTT TCGGCATCCT CG -            #GCGGAAAA   6240                                                                 - - CCCCGCGTCG ATCAGTTCTT GCCTGTATGC CTTCCGGTCA AACGTCCGAT TC -            #ATTCACCC   6300                                                                 - - TCCTTGCGGG ATTGCCCCGA CTCACGCCGG GGCAATGTGC CCTTATTCCT GA -            #TTTGACCC   6360                                                                 - - GCCTGGTGCC TTGGTGTCCA GATAATCCAC CTTATCGGCA ATGAAGTCGG TC -            #CCGTAGAC   6420                                                                 - - CGTCTGGCCG TCCTTCTCGT ACTTGGTATT CCGAATCTTG CCCTGCACGA AT -            #ACCAGCTC   6480                                                                 - - CGCGAAGTCG CTCTTCTTGA TGGAGCGCAT GGGGACGTGC TTGGCAATCA CG -            #CGCACCCC   6540                                                                 - - CCGGCCGTTT TAGCGGCTAA AAAAGTCATG GCTCTGCCCT CGGGCGGACC AC -            #GCCCATCA   6600                                                                 - - TGACCTTGCC AAGCTCGTCC TGCTTCTCTT CGATCTTCGC CAGCAGGGCG AG -            #GATCGTGG   6660                                                                 - - CATCACCGAA CCGCGCCGTG CGCGGGTCGT CGGTGAGCCA GAGTTTCAGC AG -            #GCCGCCCA   6720                                                                 - - GGCGGCCCAG GTCGCCATTG ATGCGGGCCA GCTCGCGGAC GTGCTCATAG TC -            #CACGACGC   6780                                                                 - - CCGTGATTTT GTAGCCCTGG CCGACGGCCA GCAGGTAGGC CGACAGGCTC AT -            #GCCGGCCG   6840                                                                 - - CCGCCGCCTT TTCCTCAATC GCTCTTCGTT CGTCTGGAAG GCAGTACACC TT -            #GATAGGTG   6900                                                                 - - GGCTGCCCTT CCTGGTTGGC TTGGTTTCAT CAGCCATCCG CTTGCCCTCA TC -            #TGTTACGC   6960                                                                 - - CGGCGGTAGC CGGCCAGCCT CGCAGAGCAG GATTCCCGTT GAGCACCGCC AG -            #GTGCGAAT   7020                                                                 - - AAGGGACAGT GAAGAAGGAA CACCCGCTCG CGGGTGGGCC TACTTCACCT AT -            #CCTGCCCG   7080                                                                 - - GCTGACGCCG TTGGATACAC CAAGGAAAGT CTACACGAAC CCTTTGGCAA AA -            #TCCTGTAT   7140                                                                 - - ATCGTGCGAA AAAGGATGGA TATACCGAAA AAATCGCTAT AATGACCCCG AA -            #GCAGGGTT   7200                                                                 - - ATGCAGCGGA AAAGATCCGA TCGTCAACGT TCACTTCTAA AGAAATAGCG CC -            #ACTCAGCT   7260                                                                 - - TCCTCAGCGG CTTTATCCAG CGATTTCCTA TTATGTCGGC ATAGTTCTCA AG -            #ATCGACAG   7320                                                                 - - CGTGTCACGG TTAAGCGAGA AATGAATAAG AAGGCTGATA ATTCGGATCT CT -            #GCGAGGGA   7380                                                                 - - GATGATATTT GATCACAGGC AGCAACGCTC TGTCATCGTT ACAATCAACA TG -            #CTACCCTC   7440                                                                 - - CGCGAGATCA TCCGTGTTTC AAACCCGGCA GCTTAGTTGC CGTTCTTCCG AA -            #TAGCATCG   7500                                                                 - - GTAACATGAG CAAAGTCTGC CGCCTTACAA CGGCTCTCCC GCTGACGCCG TC -            #CCGGACTG   7560                                                                 - - ATGGGCTGCC TGTATCGAGT GGTGATTTTG TGCCGAGCTG CCGGTCGGGG AG -            #CTGTTGGC   7620                                                                 - - TGGCTGGTGG CAGGATATAT TGTGGTGTAA ACAAATTGAC GCTTAGACAA CT -            #TAATAACA   7680                                                                 - - CATTGCGGAC GTTTTTAATG TACCAAGCTT GCATGCCTGC AGSTCGAGTT AT -            #TTTCAAAA   7740                                                                 - - AGCAGTATCG GCTAGAGCAT CAAGAAACTC GATTAAAAGT TTATCAAATG AA -            #GCTGGAAA   7800                                                                 - - AGTCTTGACA GAGTTAGAAG ACATTAAAAT AGAGGTTGTG GAGTATTGTA AA -            #AGAATTAT   7860                                                                 - - GCAAGCGCAA CCTACATGAC TAGTGGAGAT ATCATATGAC TACTTATCAG GG -            #TTGGTGAA   7920                                                                 - - TTTTAAATAT TCCCAGACTG CTGCTAAAAC CTTAATGCAT CCAATTGGTG TT -            #GACGAGAT   7980                                                                 - - GGCTATCCTG CTCAGTTTTT AATTGCTGCT TGGTCGATCT TGGAAATGAT TT -            #TATAATAG   8040                                                                 - - CAGTGCAGTC CTTCTTGATC TTTGGATGCA TGCCCAAAAG TGTTAAATCA AC -            #TATTCTGA   8100                                                                 - - CTCTTGTTCC CAAAACAGAT GGTGCACAAA ATATGAAGGA GTTCATACTG AT -            #AGCGTGAT   8160                                                                 - - GCAATCTTCT ATATTAAGTG ATATATAAGA TAATAGCAAA CCGGCTTAAA GT -            #TACTTTAC   8220                                                                 - - AAGAGGCGAT GGAACCGAAT CAGAGCACCT TTGTGAAGGG GAGGCTCTTA CT -            #AGAGAACA   8280                                                                 - - TATTTTTAGC AACAAAACTA GTCAAGGACT ACCACAAGCA ATCACTCTCA TC -            #TCGTTTAG   8340                                                                 - - CAATTAAGCT TGATATCTCT AAAGCGTTTG ACATAGAGCA ATGGCCGTTT AT -            #TGCTGCTA   8400                                                                 - - GGCTACGTGT GATGGGTTAT CCATAGCTCT TTATACACTA GATAAATATA TG -            #CATCTCTA   8460                                                                 - - CGTCCTCGTT TTGTTTTTTT CTCTAGCTCT TGTGGTATAA GGAAAGGATG CT -            #CTCTTTCA   8520                                                                 - - CCGTACTTCT ATGTTATCAT CAACAATGTT TTGTCGACTA TGTTAAACAG AG -            #CAGCTGTT   8580                                                                 - - ATGAAAGAGA TTGGTTCTCA CCCGTTTTGC AAGGAGATAA AGCTTACACA TC -            #TTAGTTTT   8640                                                                 - - GCTGATGATA TTATGGTCTT CATGGATGGT ACTCTTGGTT CTCTCTGCAA CA -            #TCATGATA   8700                                                                 - - GTGGTTGATG AGTATGCCCA TATTTCAGTT TTTAACATCA ATGTGTCCAA GT -            #CCACAATA   8760                                                                 - - TTTGATGCGG GTCGAGGGAA GATGACTTTG GAAATAGGGG CCACATCAGT AG -            #GGTTAGTA   8820                                                                 - - GTAAGTTCTC TTCCCATTTG GTACCTTGGG CTGCGCTAAC CACAAAAGCA AT -            #GACGAGAC   8880                                                                 - - TTGACTACAA ACCTCTACTT GACAAGATAA GGTCTCGTTT TTTAATTGGA CA -            #AGCAAGCA   8940                                                                 - - CCTCTCACTT GAGGTTGTCT ACAACTTATG AACTCAGTTA TATGAAGCAT CT -            #TAATTTTC   9000                                                                 - - TGGTGTTCAG TCTTCAGGCT TCCAAAAAAT GTTTTTAGAC ATTGAAAGGA GG -            #TGTAGTTC   9060                                                                 - - ATTCCTCTAG AGTGGATCAT CGCTTGATGC AACTAAAGCA AAAGTGTCTT GG -            #GAGGAGGT   9120                                                                 - - TTGCTACTCA AAAAAGGAAG GGGGCTTGGG GTTCCGCGTA TGATGGAGAT GT -            #CTTTGATT   9180                                                                 - - TATGCGTTGA GCCTAATATG GAGGTTATAT ACCATGTCGG GCTCTCTATG GG -            #TGGCATAG   9240                                                                 - - ATAAGTCATT ACCTTCTGCG CCAAGAATCA TTTTGGGATA TCAAAGCAAC GT -            #CCTTAGGG   9300                                                                 - - TCTTCGGTTG GACGTAAGCT GCTCAAGCTT TGCCCACAAG CCATTGAGTT TA -            #TAAGAATG   9360                                                                 - - GAAGTAAAAG ATGGAGTTAA GACACGATCC TAGTCGGATA CTTGGTTGTC AA -            #TGGGGAGT   9420                                                                 - - CTTATTGATC GTAGTTGGAG AAAGGGGAAC ATATGAATTG GGAGTGCACC GA -            #GATGCTAC   9480                                                                 - - AGTTGCAGAG GTTGTAGCAA GAGGTCACTG GTCAATCCGT CGTGGTCAGA AC -            #CAACATAT   9540                                                                 - - AAGTTTGATT GTGGACCAGA TCATAGCTAA AGACCCGTCC GTACACTCGG CT -            #AGTCAAGA   9600                                                                 - - TCATTGATTA GTATATATAC ATATTGTATT GCATGAAAAG TGTTTAAAGT AA -            #ATTGTGTC   9660                                                                 - - YTATACAAAG AATATATATR ACGATCATTG ATTAGTATAT ATACATATTG TA -            #TTGTGTGT   9720                                                                 - - TTAAAGTAAA TTGTGTCCTA TACAAAGAAT ATCTTTGTGG AGAAGCAAAG AG -            #AATACATA   9780                                                                 - - CTTACGTAGG AATCTTTTTG TTTTCTTTTT TCAAAACGTA AGAATGTTTG CT -            #TCCTTACA   9840                                                                 - - ATTCATACTT ATTAACTTAC ATATTATGTT TTCTTTTAAA TATTAAAAAT AA -            #CTAATTTT   9900                                                                 - - TATTAGGCAG CAAGTCATTT ACAAAGTAAA AAATTTCTGC CATGCATGTA AC -            #CTTCATTT   9960                                                                 - - ATCATTCATT TTAGTTTGTA ACTTTTTATT AGATTTTGAT CAAGTTAACC GC -            #TAAAATCT  10020                                                                 - - CATTTTATCC GTTCGCATTA AAGTTAAATA GATTGCTGAC ATATTTTAAA TC -            #TAATAGAA  10080                                                                 - - AATGCCATCT GGCAAATAAA CAACGGACAC GATTTTAAAC TAAATTTTAC CA -            #AAAAGAAA  10140                                                                 - - AAACTTATAC GACTTTTCTT GCTTAGAAGT CTTTGCATTG TTAATAGATT GT -            #TGAAAAGG  10200                                                                 - - TTTATTCATT ACTTTCATGC AGAGAGATAA CATATCATCG CGTGGGGATT TA -            #TTCAATCC  10260                                                                 - - AAAGAAAAGC TTCCAAAAAC TGACTYTGCT TCATGAAACA CTCACTCTAA TT -            #TGCTTCAT  10320                                                                 - - CAATCTTAGG ACTGACTTTT CCAAATCAAT AATCCCGGSG AWCYATSTKC KM -            #WTKKMCAW  10380                                                                 - - WGKKTTCGTG TTTTTTCGAA AGGAGACAAC TATCTTTTTA AAAGCTTTTC TA -            #TAGTGTGA  10440                                                                 - - TGACAAAAAA AAAATGTAAT TGTTAGTTGC AAAAGAAAAG TACAATAGTC TT -            #TTCTAGTT  10500                                                                 - - TTGAGAGTTT AAGGTTTATG ATCGGAACTT AGAGTTTAAA TTTAAACTAT TT -            #TGTTAATT  10560                                                                 - - TTTGGACTGA TAACAGTTTT TTTTTGAAAA TATTGAAACG TTGTTTACCT AA -            #TGTAACAT  10620                                                                 - - GTTATTCTAC TTAAATTACT TTATATTTTA ATAACATATA ATATTGAATA GG -            #ATATCATA  10680                                                                 - - GGATATTATT ACGTAATAAT ATCCTATGGT GTCATTTTAT AAGTTAGCAC AA -            #GCTTGTTT  10740                                                                 - - TAACTTATAA AATGATTCTC CCTCCATATA AAAAAGTTTG ATTTTATAGA AT -            #GTTTATAC  10800                                                                 - - CGATTAAAAA AATAATAATG CTTAGTTATA AATTACTATT TATTCATGCT AA -            #ACTATTTC  10860                                                                 - - TCGTAACTAT TAACCAATAG TAATTCATCA AATTTTAAAA TTCTCAATTA AT -            #TGATTCTT  10920                                                                 - - GAAATTCATA ACCTTTTAAT ATTGATTGAT AAAAATATAC ATAAACTCAA TC -            #TTTTTAAT  10980                                                                 - - ACAAAAAAAC TTTAAAAAAT CAATTTTTCT GATTCGGAGG GAGTATATGT TA -            #TTGCTTAG  11040                                                                 - - AATCACAGAT TCATATCAGG ATTGGAAAAT TTTAAAGCCA GTGCATATCA GT -            #AGTCAAAA  11100                                                                 - - TTGGTAAATG ATATACGAAG GCGGTACMAA ATTAGGTATA CTGGAGATAG GA -            #GGACCCCC  11160                                                                 - - AAGTAGGTCG GTCACCTAGA GTTTTTCCAA TTAAACTGCG TATTAGTGTT TG -            #GGAAAAAA  11220                                                                 - - AAACCAWRYS TMWRSCATGK CRGTATMGRT SMYCKKKWTT KTYTTTTTTT TT -            #TTTTTTTT  11280                                                                 - - TCTTTTTGGA TAAATCTCAA TGGGTGATCT ATTGACTGTT TCTCTACGTC AC -            #TATTTTAC  11340                                                                 - - TTACGTCATA GATGTGGCGG CATATATTCT TCAGGACTTT TCAGCCATAG GC -            #AAGAGTGA  11400                                                                 - - TAGAGATACT CATATGCATG AAACACTAAG AAACAAATAA TTCTTGACTT TT -            #TTTCTTTT  11460                                                                 - - ATTTGAAAAT TGACTGTAGA TATAAACTTT TATTTTTTCT GACTGTAAAT AT -            #AATCTTAA  11520                                                                 - - TTGCCAAACT GTCCGATACG ATTTTTCTGT ATTATTTACA GGAAGATATC TT -            #CAMAACAT  11580                                                                 - - TTTGAATGAA GTAATATATG AAATTCAAAT TTGAAATAGA AGACTTAAAT TA -            #GAATCATG  11640                                                                 - - AAGAAAAAAA AACACAAAAC AACTGAATGA CATGAAACAA CTATATACAA TG -            #TTTCTTAA  11700                                                                 - - TAAACTTCAT TTAGGGTATA CTTACATATA TACTAAAAAA ATATATCAAC AA -            #TGGCAAAG  11760                                                                 - - CTACCGATAC GAAACAATAT TAGGAAAAAT GTGTGTAAGG ACAAGATTGA CA -            #MAAAAATA  11820                                                                 - - GTTACGAAAA CAACTTCTAT TCATTTGGAC AATTGCAATG AATATTACTA AA -            #ATACTCAC  11880                                                                 - - ACATGGACCA TGTATTTACA MAAACGTGAG ATCTATAGTT AACAAAAAAA AA -            #AAAGAAAA  11940                                                                 - - AAATAGTTTT CAAATCTCTA TATAAGCGAT GTTTACGAAC CCCAAAATCA TA -            #ACACAACA  12000                                                                 - - ATAACCATTA TCAACTTAGA AAAATGGAAG ACGCCAAAAA CATAAAGAAA GG -            #CCCGGCGC  12060                                                                 - - CATTCTATCC TCTDGAAGAT GGAACCGCTG GAGAGNCAAC TGCATAAGGC TA -            #TGAAGANG  12120                                                                 - - ATACGCCCTG GTTCCTGGAA CAATTGCTTT TACAGATGCA CATATCGAGG TG -            #VACATCAC  12180                                                                 - - GTACGCNGAG TACTTCGAAA TGTCCGTTCG GTNNTGNGCA GAAGNNCTAT GA -            #AACGANTA  12240                                                                 - - TGGGCTGAAT ACAAATCACA GAATCGTCGT ATGCAGTGAA AACTCTCTTC AA -            #TTCTTTAT  12300                                                                 - - GCCGGTGTTG GGCGCGTTAT TTATCGGAGT TGCAGTTGCG CCCGCGAACG AC -            #ATTTATAA  12360                                                                 - - TGAACGTGAA TTGCTCAACA GTATGRRCAT TTCGCAGCCT ACCGTRGTGT TY -            #GTTTCCAA  12420                                                                 - - AAAGGGGTTG CAAAAAATTT TGAACGTGCA AAAAAARYTM CCAATMATCC AR -            #AAAATTAT  12480                                                                 - - TATCATGGAT TCTAAAACGG ATTACCAGGG ATTTCAGTCG ATGTACACGT TC -            #GTCACATC  12540                                                                 - - TCATCTACCT CCCGGTTTTA ATGAATACGA TTTTGTRCCA GAGTCCTTYG AT -            #MGKGACAA  12600                                                                 - - RACAATTGCA CTGATMATGA AYTCCTCTGG ATCTACTGGK YTRCCTAARG GT -            #GTSGCYCT  12660                                                                 - - KCCKCATAGA ACTGCCTGCG TSAGATTCTC GCATGCCAGA GATCCTATTT TT -            #GGCAATCA  12720                                                                 - - AATCATTCCG GATACTGCGA TTTTAAGTGT TGTTCCATTC CATCACGGTT TT -            #GGAATGTT  12780                                                                 - - TACTACACTC GGATATTTGA TATGTGGATT TCGAGTCGTC TTAATGTATA GA -            #TTTGAAGA  12840                                                                 - - AGAGCTGTTT YTRMGRWSCC TTCAGGATTA CAARATTCAA AGTGCGYTGC TR -            #GTRCCAAC  12900                                                                 - - CCTATTYTCM TTCTTCGCCA AAAGCACTCT GATTGACAAA TACGATTTAT CT -            #AATTTACA  12960                                                                 - - CGAAATTGCT TCTGGKGGCG CWCCYCTYTC KAARGAAGTC GGGGAAGCGG TT -            #GCMAARMG  13020                                                                 - - STTCCATCTK CCAGGKATMM GRCAAGGATA TGGGCTCACT GAGACTACAT CA -            #GCTATTCT  13080                                                                 - - GATTACACCC GAGGGGGATG ATAAACCGGG CGCGGTCGGT AAAGTTGTTC CA -            #TTTTTTGA  13140                                                                 - - AGCGAAGGTT GTGGATCTGG ATACCGGGAA AACGCTGGGC GTTAATCARA GA -            #GGCGAAYT  13200                                                                 - - RTGTGTSAGA GGWCCTATGA TTATGTCCGG TTATGTAAAC AATCCGGAAG CG -            #ACCAACGC  13260                                                                 - - CTTGATTGAC AAGGATGGAT GGCTACATTC TGGAGACATA GCTTACTGGG AC -            #GAAGACGA  13320                                                                 - - ACACTTCTTC ATMGTTGACC GCYTGAAGTC TYTRATTAAR TACAAAGGMT AT -            #CAGGTGGC  13380                                                                 - - YCCCGCTGAA TTGGAATCSA TMTTGYTMCA ACACCCCAAC ATCTTCGACG CR -            #GGYGTSGC  13440                                                                 - - AGGTCTTCCC GACGATGACG CCGGTGAACT TCCCGCCGCC GTTGTTGTTT TG -            #GAGCACGG  13500                                                                 - - AAAGACGATG ACGGAAAAAG AGATCGTGGA TTACGTCGCC AGTCAAGTAA CA -            #ACCGCGAA  13560                                                                 - - AAAGTTGCGC GGAGGAGTTG TGTTTGTGGA CGAAGTACCG AAAGGTCTTA CC -            #GGAAAACT  13620                                                                 - - CGACGCAAGA AAAATCAGAG AGATCCTCAT AAAGGCCAAG AAGGGCGGAA AG -            #WYCRMMKT  13680                                                                 - - GTAAAATGTA ACTGTATTCA GCGATGACGA AATTCTTAGC TATTGTAATA TT -            #ATATGCAA  13740                                                                 - - ATTGATGAAT GGTAATTTTG TAATTGTGGG TCACTGTACT ATTTTAACGA AT -            #AATAAAAT  13800                                                                 - - CAGGTATAGG TAACTAAAAA GGAATTCGAG CTCGAATTCC CGATCTAGTA AC -            #ATAGATGA  13860                                                                 - - CACCGCGCGC GATAATTTAT CCTAGTTTGC GCGCTATATT TTGTTTTCTA TC -            #GCGTATTA  13920                                                                 - - AATGTATAAT TGCGGGACTC TAATCATAAA AACCCATCTC ATAAATAACG TC -            #ATGCATTA  13980                                                                 - - CATGTTAATT ATTACATGCT TAACGTAATT CAACAGAAAT TATATGATAA TC -            #ATCGCAAG  14040                                                                 - - ACCGGCAACA GGATTCAATC TTAAGAAACT TTATTGCCAA ATGTTTGAAC GA -            #TCGGGGAT  14100                                                                 - - CGATCCCGTG GCG              - #                  - #                      - #   14113                                                                __________________________________________________________________________

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for selecting disease resistant mutantplants from a population of plants transformed with a reporter geneunder the regulation of an SAR gene promoter that is inducible bybenzo-1,2,3-thiadiazoles, isonicotinic acid compounds, or salicylic acidcompounds, said method comprising:a) evaluating the expression of saidreporter gene in uninfected plants that are phenotypically normal inthat said plants lack a lesion mimic phenotype; and b) selecting plantsthat constitutively express said reporter gene in the absence of viral,bacterial, or fungal infection.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein saidSAR gene promoter is a PR-1 promoter.
 3. The method of claim 1, whereinsaid reporter gene is luciferase.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein saidSAR gene promoter is a PR-1 promoter and said reporter gene isluciferase.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said PR-1 promoter andsaid luciferase gene form a chimeric construct having the DNA sequencepresented in SEQ ID NO:
 1. 6. The method of claim 1, further comprisingevaluating resistance to viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens in saidplants that constitutively express said reporter gene and selectingplants that are resistant to viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens. 7.The method of claim 6, wherein said plants are evaluated for resistanceto Peronospora parasitica or Erysiphe cichoracearum.
 8. A method forselecting disease resistant mutant plants, said method comprising:a)generating a population of plants transformed with a reporter gene underthe regulation of an SAR gene promoter that is inducible bybenzo-1,2,3-thiadiazoles, isonicotinic acid compounds, or salicylic acidcompounds; b) evaluating the expression of said reporter gene inuninfected plants; and c) selecting from said population of plants,plants that constitutively express said reporter gene in the absence ofviral, bacterial, or fungal infection and are thereby disease resistantmutant plants.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said SAR gene promoteris a PR-1 promoter.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein said reportergene is luciferase.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein said SAR genepromoter is a PR-1 promoter and said reporter gene is luciferase. 12.The method of claim 11, wherein said PR-1 promoter and said luciferasegene form a chimeric construct having the DNA sequence presented in SEQID NO:
 1. 13. The method of claim 8, further comprising evaluatingresistance to viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens in said plants thatconstitutively express said reporter gene and selecting plants that areresistant to viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens.
 14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein said plants are evaluated for resistance toPeronospora parasitica or Erysiphe cichoracearum.